Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2023-49832

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Gemini Labs Site Reviews site-reviews allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Site Reviews: from n/a through <= 6.10.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Site Reviews WordPress plugin versions up to 6.10.2 contain a missing authorization vulnerability allowing exploitation of incorrectly configured access control security levels. This authorization bypass likely permits unauthenticated or low-privileged users to perform actions that should require higher permission levels, such as accessing or modifying review data they shouldn't have rights to.

MitigationUpgrade Site Reviews to the latest version available from Gemini Labs which contains proper authorization controls. If unable to upgrade immediately, review user role capabilities and restrict plugin settings to trusted administrator accounts only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Site Reviews plugin installation and version
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate Site Reviews. Check the version number displayed below the plugin name. Alternatively, check the main plugin file (site-reviews/plugin.php) for the 'Version' header.
    Affected if Version is 6.10.2 or earlier (any version up to and including 6.10.2)
  2. Inspect plugin access control settings
    Navigate to Site Reviews > Settings > General. Look for options controlling who can create, edit, or delete reviews. Check if 'Guests', 'Subscribers', 'Contributors', or 'Authors' have permissions enabled for review submission or management.
    Affected if Any setting allows unauthenticated users or roles below Administrator to submit, modify, or delete reviews
  3. Review assigned capabilities for custom roles
    If using a role management plugin, inspect custom roles for Site Reviews capabilities such as 'create_site-reviews', 'edit_site-reviews', 'delete_site-reviews', or 'manage_site-reviews_options'. Check WordPress Users > Roles if any custom roles exist.
    Affected if Non-administrator roles have been granted elevated Site Reviews capabilities
  4. Check for exposed AJAX actions
    Inspect the site's public-facing AJAX endpoints (wp-admin/admin-ajax.php) for Site Reviews actions. Review plugin PHP files in the 'includes' folder for AJAX hooks marked with missing capability checks.
    Affected if AJAX actions respond to requests without proper capability verification

You are affected if Site Reviews plugin version 6.10.2 or earlier is installed AND the plugin settings or user role configurations grant elevated review management permissions to unauthenticated or low-privileged users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Site Reviews to the latest version available from Gemini Labs which contains proper authorization controls. If unable to upgrade immediately, review user role capabilities and restrict plugin settings to trusted administrator accounts only.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-49832 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-49832 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data