CVE-2023-49860
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in weDevs WP Project Manager – Task, team, and project management plugin featuring kanban board and gantt charts allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Project Manager – Task, team, and project management plugin featuring kanban board and gantt charts: from n/a through 2.6.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the weDevs WP Project Manager plugin where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being rendered in web pages. This allows an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code that executes in the browsers of other users viewing the affected content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.6.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify WP Project Manager plugin is installedLog into WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and locate 'WP Project Manager' in the list. Note whether it appears as active or inactive.Affected if The plugin is installed and active in WordPress.
-
Check the installed plugin versionIn the Plugins list, click on the plugin name or view details to find the version number displayed in the plugin metadata.Affected if The displayed version number is 2.6.7 or any version lower than 2.6.7.
-
Confirm the plugin handles user-supplied inputNavigate to a project created with WP Project Manager. Look for input fields where users can submit content such as subtasks, comments, project descriptions, or task details.Affected if User input fields exist and the plugin displays submitted content back to users.
-
Test for stored XSS presence (optional verification)If you have a test environment, create a new task or subtask with a harmless JavaScript payload in a visible field (e.g., <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>). Save it and view the page where it displays.Affected if The payload renders as unescaped HTML/JavaScript rather than being displayed as plain text.
Your environment is affected if the WP Project Manager plugin version is 2.6.7 or lower and users can create or view content that includes unescaped user input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the WP Project Manager plugin to the latest version (2.6.8 or later) which should contain proper input sanitization and output escaping. If no update is available, implement output escaping at the point where user input is rendered in the application.
Version 2.6.8 or latest available release
- 1. Backup your WordPress site and database before making any changes
- 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in your WordPress admin dashboard
- 3. Find 'WP Project Manager' in the list of installed plugins
- 4. Click 'Update now' if an update is available, or manually download the latest version from wordpress.org
- 5. After updating, verify the plugin version is 2.6.8 or higher
- 6. Test the project management functionality to ensure the update did not break existing features
- 7. Clear any caching plugins or server-side caches after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-49860 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-49860 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data