Transformation Extender AdvancedApplication · Ibm

CVE-2023-49883

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Transformation Extender Advanced 10.0.1 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Transformation Extender Advanced 10.0.1 ships with weak or no password complexity requirements enforced by default. This allows users to set weak passwords (e.g., short, simple, or dictionary-based), making brute-force or dictionary attacks more effective against compromised accounts.

MitigationConfigure the application to enforce strong password policies including minimum length requirements, complexity rules (uppercase, lowercase, digits, special characters), and account lockout thresholds. Consult IBM documentation for password policy configuration options.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Transformation Extender AdvancedApplication
Affected:= 10.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IBM Transformation Extender Advanced version
    Check the installed version of IBM Transformation Extender Advanced on the system. This can typically be found in the application installation directory, system information, or by querying the application via its version command or control panel entry.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 10.0.1
  2. Locate password policy configuration
    Identify the configuration file or administrative interface where password policies are defined for IBM Transformation Extender Advanced. This may be in the application's administration console, configuration directory, or IBM-specific configuration files.
    Affected if The password policy configuration file or settings cannot be located or accessed
  3. Check password complexity settings
    Examine the password policy configuration for the presence and enforcement of complexity requirements including minimum length, uppercase letters, lowercase letters, digits, and special characters. Verify whether these settings are explicitly configured or left at default values.
    Affected if Password complexity requirements are not explicitly configured or are set to weak/none values
  4. Check minimum password length setting
    Inspect the password policy for a minimum length requirement. Look for a configured value and verify it meets recognized standards (typically 8+ characters).
    Affected if The minimum password length is set to a low value or is not configured
  5. Check account lockout configuration
    Review the password policy or security settings for account lockout thresholds that protect against brute-force attempts, such as maximum failed login attempts before lockout.
    Affected if Account lockout thresholds are not configured or are set to overly permissive values

A user is affected if they are running IBM Transformation Extender Advanced version 10.0.1 and the password complexity requirements are using default (weak) settings or have not been explicitly configured to enforce strong password policies.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Configure the application to enforce strong password policies including minimum length requirements, complexity rules (uppercase, lowercase, digits, special characters), and account lockout thresholds. Consult IBM documentation for password policy configuration options.

Fix this in Transformation Extender Advanced Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-49883 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-49883 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data