CVE-2023-49959
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Indo-Sol PROFINET-INspektor NT through 2.4.0, a command injection vulnerability in the gedtupdater service of the firmware allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands with root privileges via a crafted filename parameter in POST requests to the /api/updater/ctrl/start_update endpoint.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability exists in the gedtupdater service of Indo-Sol PROFINET-INspektor NT firmware through v2.4.0. Remote attackers can execute arbitrary system commands with root privileges by sending crafted filename parameters in POST requests to the /api/updater/ctrl/start_update endpoint. This is an unauthenticated vulnerability with critical severity due to the trivial exploitability and complete system compromise possible.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify firmware versionAccess the device web interface or check via SSH/telnet for the firmware version. Look for a version indicator in the system status or about page, or retrieve it via an API call if available.Affected if The installed firmware version is lower than 2.4.1 (e.g., v2.4.0 or earlier).
-
Confirm gedtupdater service presenceCheck if the gedtupdater service or updater component is running on the device. This may be visible in the device's service list, process list, or within the web interface under system services or running processes.Affected if The gedtupdater service is present and running on the device.
-
Test vulnerable endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access the /api/updater/ctrl/start_update endpoint via HTTP POST from an internal network host. This requires sending a POST request with a filename parameter to see if the endpoint responds.Affected if The endpoint responds to requests, indicating it is exposed and may accept parameters without authentication.
-
Assess network exposureReview firewall rules, network configuration, or access control lists to determine if the device management interface or API endpoints are accessible from untrusted networks or the internet.Affected if The device or its management interface is reachable from untrusted networks without proper access controls.
A user is affected if their Indu Sol Profinet Inspektor NT firmware is below v2.4.1 AND the gedtupdater service with the vulnerable /api/updater/ctrl/start_update endpoint is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.1
Apply vendor firmware update to v2.4.1 or later. If no patch is available, isolate the device behind a firewall with strict access controls, disable the updater service if possible, and monitor for exploitation attempts.
2.4.1 or later
- Verify current firmware version by accessing the device web interface or checking system information
- Download the firmware version 2.4.1 or later from the official vendor source (indu-sol.com)
- Access the device administrative interface and navigate to the firmware update section
- Upload and apply the firmware update following the vendor's standard upgrade procedure
- After reboot, verify the new version is installed and the /api/updater/ctrl/start_update endpoint no longer accepts malicious input
- Confirm the gedtupdater service is running correctly post-update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,256.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-49959 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-49959 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data