CVE-2023-50208
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link G416 ovpncfg Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link G416 routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the HTTP service listening on TCP port 80. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-21441.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in the ovpncfg component of D-Link G416 routers. The HTTP service on TCP port 80 copies user-supplied data to a fixed-length stack buffer without validating its length, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code as root without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.09b01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelCheck the device label or web interface for the exact model number (typically found on a sticker on the device or in the web UI header)Affected if The device is not a D-Link G416 router (this CVE does not apply to other models)
-
Determine the installed firmware versionAccess the router web interface (HTTP on port 80) and navigate to the Status or System Information page to view the firmware version; alternatively, check the firmware file if you have local accessAffected if The firmware version is lower than 1.09b01 (versions prior to this are vulnerable)
-
Verify the HTTP management service is enabledAttempt to connect to the router on TCP port 80 (HTTP) from the network; check the router's firewall or access control settings in the web interface under Security or AdministrationAffected if The HTTP service on TCP port 80 is exposed and accessible (this is the attack vector)
-
Confirm ovpncfg component presenceIf you have SSH or telnet access to the router, look for the ovpncfg binary or configuration utility in the filesystem (typically under /usr/bin or /etc); otherwise, this check relies on firmware versionAffected if The ovpncfg component exists on the device (the vulnerability is in this specific component)
-
Check network exposure of management interfaceReview firewall rules, port forwarding settings, or WAN access configuration to determine if TCP port 80 is reachable from outside the local networkAffected if TCP port 80 is reachable from untrusted networks (increases exploitability)
A D-Link G416 router with firmware version below 1.09b01 that has its HTTP service (TCP port 80) accessible is affected by this vulnerability and allows remote unauthenticated code execution as root.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.09b01
Apply vendor firmware patches when available; until then, restrict network access to the router's management interface (TCP port 80) to minimize exposure.
D-Link G416 Firmware version 1.09b01 or later
- Locate the D-Link G416 router administration interface by accessing its IP address in a web browser
- Navigate to the Firmware Upgrade or Management section in the router settings
- Download the latest firmware version 1.09b01 or later from the official D-Link support website (support.dlink.com)
- Upload the firmware file through the router's web interface and wait for the upgrade process to complete
- After the router reboots, verify the firmware version has been updated to 1.09b01 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-50208 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-50208 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data