CVE-2023-50210
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link G416 httpd API-AUTH Digest Processing Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link G416 routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the HTTP service listening on TCP port 80. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-21662.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in D-Link G416 router's HTTP service (port 80) during API-AUTH Digest Processing. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user-supplied data length before copying to a fixed-size stack buffer, enabling remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.09b01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the router administration interface or check the device label to confirm the exact model is D-Link G416Affected if Device is not a D-Link G416 model
-
Check firmware versionNavigate to router admin panel (typically System > Firmware or Status page) and locate the firmware version string; alternatively, use command-line tools like 'cat /proc/version' or 'nvram get firmware_version' if SSH/telnet access is availableAffected if Firmware version is lower than 1.09b01 or cannot be determined
-
Verify HTTP service is enabledConfirm that the HTTP service (web management interface on port 80) is currently active on the router; check via 'netstat -tulpn | grep :80' if shell access exists, or attempt to access http://router-ip from a connected clientAffected if HTTP service is running and responds to requests on port 80
-
Assess network exposure of management interfaceDetermine if the HTTP management interface is accessible from untrusted networks (WAN/Internet) rather than only from LAN; test by attempting to access the router's public IP on port 80 from an external location, or review firewall rules that permit or block inbound HTTP trafficAffected if HTTP management interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the Internet
Environment is affected if the device is a D-Link G416 router running firmware version prior to 1.09b01 with the HTTP service enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.09b01
Apply vendor firmware updates when available; as an interim control, disable remote HTTP management or restrict management interface to trusted networks via firewall rules.
G416 Firmware version 1.09b01
- 1. Download the firmware version 1.09b01 or later from the official D-Link support website (support.dlink.com)
- 2. Access the D-Link G416 router web management interface
- 3. Navigate to the firmware upgrade section (typically under Administration > Firmware Upgrade or Settings > Maintenance)
- 4. Upload the downloaded firmware file (.bin or .img)
- 5. Wait for the upgrade process to complete - do not power off the device
- 6. After reboot, verify the firmware version has been updated to 1.09b01 or later
- 7. Confirm the HTTP service is functioning normally on port 80
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation5.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,864.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-50210 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-50210 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data