CVE-2023-50312
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 24.0.0.2 could provide weaker than expected security for outbound TLS connections caused by a failure to honor user configuration. IBM X-Force ID: 274711.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty versions 17.0.0.3 through 24.0.0.2 contains a flaw where outbound TLS connections fail to honor user-defined security configurations, potentially resulting in weaker encryption or improper certificate validation than the administrator expects.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.0.0.3, < 24.0.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed WebSphere Liberty versionRun the Liberty 'version' command from the install directory, or inspect the lib/versions/websphereliberty.jar manifest file for the Implementation-Version attributeAffected if The version is 17.0.0.3 through 24.0.0.2 (versions below 17.0.0.3 or at or above 24.0.0.3 are not affected)
-
Identify outbound TLS-configured applications or servicesReview the server.xml file for any outbound HTTP client configurations, web service clients, or remote EJB calls that use SSL/TLS. Look for elements such as httpClient with sslRef, webservices-bindings, or any outbound connection definitions referencing an sslRefAffected if The server.xml contains any outbound connection configurations that reference SSL settings (sslRef) - the vulnerability only affects outbound TLS connections, not inbound listeners
-
Verify custom SSL security configurations existInspect server.xml for custom SSL configurations such as ssl element definitions, keyStore entries with custom settings, or sslRef pointing to non-default security settingsAffected if Custom SSL configuration is defined (the flaw causes these user-defined configurations to be ignored for outbound connections)
-
Test outbound TLS connection behaviorUse a tool like openssl s_client or a custom Java test client to connect to an outbound TLS endpoint and verify the negotiated cipher suite and certificate validation behavior matches the configured ssl settings in server.xmlAffected if The negotiated cipher or certificate validation differs from what the ssl configuration specifies - for example, a weaker cipher is used than allowed, or certificate validation fails when it should succeed (or vice versa) based on the defined policy
You are affected if you run WebSphere Liberty 17.0.0.3-24.0.0.2 AND use outbound TLS connections with custom security configurations, where the actual TLS behavior differs from your defined configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped24.0.0.3
Apply the IBM fix for this vulnerability (either upgrade beyond 24.0.0.2 or obtain the specific patch from IBM) and verify that outbound TLS connections now correctly enforce the configured security requirements.
WebSphere Application Server Liberty 24.0.0.3 or later
- Review the current WebSphere Application Server Liberty installation and confirm the exact version (17.0.0.3 through 24.0.0.2)
- Obtain the IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 24.0.0.3 or later installation package from IBM Fix Central or your authorized IBM representative
- Follow IBM's standard upgrade procedure for WebSphere Application Server Liberty to install version 24.0.0.3 or newer
- After upgrade, verify that outbound TLS connections now honor user configuration as expected
- Test that custom TLS configurations are being applied correctly to outbound connections
- Validate that stronger cryptographic algorithms are being used for outbound TLS connections
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-50312 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-50312 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data