CVE-2023-50368
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Averta Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme: from n/a through 2.15.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in Averta Shortcodes plugin for Phlox theme allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through shortcode parameters that get stored in the database and execute when users view affected pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.15.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Averta Shortcodes plugin is installedCheck your WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'auxin-shortcodes' or 'averta-shortcodes', or view the installed plugins list in the WordPress admin dashboard.Affected if The plugin folder or listing is found in your WordPress installation
-
Determine the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (usually auxin-shortcodes.php or similar in the plugin folder) and locate the version number in the plugin header comment, or check the version displayed in the WordPress plugins admin page.Affected if The version number displayed is 2.15.2 or lower
-
Identify shortcode usage in contentSearch your WordPress database (wp_posts table) for content containing shortcode tags such as [aux_ or [phlox_ or common shortcode patterns like [icon], [button], [pricing_table], or query your posts/pages for the presence of any aux- or phlox- prefixed shortcode brackets.Affected if Database contains posts or pages with shortcodes from this plugin that accept user input parameters
-
Inspect shortcode parameters for unsanitized inputExamine the post_content in your database for shortcodes that contain unsanitized attributes, particularly those that may contain HTML, JavaScript, or script-related keywords (such as onerror, onload, javascript:, <script>) within shortcode parameter values.Affected if Shortcode parameters in your content contain raw HTML or JavaScript that could execute when the page renders
You are affected if the Averta Shortcodes plugin is installed with version 2.15.2 or lower AND shortcodes from this plugin with potentially malicious parameters exist in your stored content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to version 2.15.3 or later; if update unavailable, disable the plugin or implement output escaping/sanitization on shortcode attributes as a temporary measure.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-50368 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-50368 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data