VaultApplication · Hashicorp

CVE-2023-5077

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-09-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.13.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Vault and Vault Enterprise ("Vault") Google Cloud secrets engine did not preserve existing Google Cloud IAM Conditions upon creating or updating rolesets. Fixed in Vault 1.13.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Vault Google Cloud secrets engine failed to preserve existing Google Cloud IAM Conditions when creating or updating rolesets. This meant that whenever an administrator modified a roleset (whether creating new ones or updating existing), any IAM conditions previously attached to that roleset in GCP were silently discarded, potentially weakening access controls without administrator awareness.

MitigationUpgrade to Vault 1.13.0 or later to fix this issue. Organizations should audit their GCP IAM rolesets after upgrading to identify and reapply any IAM conditions that may have been inadvertently lost during previous roleset modifications.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
VaultApplication
Affected:>= 0.10.0, < 1.13.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check the installed Vault version
    Run `vault version` or check the Vault server logs at startup to identify the exact version number
    Affected if The version is >= 0.10.0 and < 1.13.0, placing it within the affected range
  2. Determine if the Google Cloud secrets engine is enabled
    Run `vault secrets list` and look for a path with type 'gcp' or 'gcpkms'
    Affected if The Google Cloud secrets engine is enabled and in use
  3. Identify existing GCP rolesets
    Run `vault list gcp/rolesets` (or the appropriate path based on your engine mount point) to list all configured rolesets
    Affected if Any rolesets exist, indicating the engine was used to manage GCP access
  4. Check for roleset modification timestamps
    Use Vault audit logs or run `vault read gcp/roleset/<name>` for each roleset to review configuration history or timestamps of creation/updates
    Affected if Rolesets were created or updated at any point while using an affected Vault version (>= 0.10.0, < 1.13.0)
  5. Inspect GCP IAM rolesets for missing conditions
    In the Google Cloud Console or via `gcloud iam rolesets list` or `gcloud iam rolesets get-iam-policy`, examine each roleset to verify whether IAM conditions are attached
    Affected if Any roleset lacks an IAM condition that was expected to be present, or you cannot account for the condition state since the roleset was created or modified

Your environment is affected if you run a vulnerable Vault version (>= 0.10.0, < 1.13.0) with the GCP secrets engine enabled and have created or updated any rolesets, as IAM conditions on those GCP rolesets may have been silently lost.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.13.0 or later
Fixed in 1.13.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Vault 1.13.0 or later to fix this issue. Organizations should audit their GCP IAM rolesets after upgrading to identify and reapply any IAM conditions that may have been inadvertently lost during previous roleset modifications.

Recommended fix High confidence

Vault 1.13.0

  1. Review the Vault upgrade documentation and ensure your current version is compatible with upgrading to 1.13.0
  2. Perform a backup of your Vault data and configuration
  3. Upgrade Vault to version 1.13.0 or later
  4. After upgrading, verify that the Google Cloud secrets engine correctly preserves IAM Conditions when creating or updating rolesets
Caveat Review Vault 1.13.0 release notes for any breaking changes, though point releases typically have minimal impact

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Vault Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,980
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-5077 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-5077 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data