Qradar Security Information And Event ManagerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2023-50949

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5 could allow an unauthorized user to perform unauthorized actions due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 275706.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5 contains a vulnerability where improper certificate validation allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication mechanisms and perform unauthorized actions within the SIEM platform. This is a network-exploitable flaw that could enable an attacker to gain illicit access to the security monitoring system.

MitigationApply the vendor patch or security update provided by IBM for QRadar SIEM 7.5 as referenced in IBM X-Force ID 275706. Review certificate validation configurations and ensure only trusted certificates are accepted.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Qradar Security Information And Event ManagerApplication
Affected:= 7.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify QRadar SIEM version
    Run the command 'qversion' or check the About page in the QRadar console to determine the exact installed version
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 7.5.0 (this is the sole affected version)
  2. Determine network exposure of QRadar interface
    Review firewall rules and network access controls to check if the QRadar console and API endpoints are exposed to untrusted networks or the internet
    Affected if QRadar management interfaces are accessible from untrusted networks without VPN or proper network segmentation
  3. Review certificate validation settings
    Inspect the SSL/TLS configuration for QRadar components in the Admin UI under 'Advanced Deployment Settings' or check the configuration files for certificate validation parameters
    Affected if Certificate validation is disabled, set to 'none', or configured to accept any certificate (validation bypassed)
  4. Check authentication logs for anomalies
    Review QRadar audit logs (System > Log Activity) for authentication events originating from unexpected IP addresses, failed certificate validation events, or unusual API access patterns
    Affected if Authentication events show successful logins from untrusted sources or certificate validation failures that were bypassed
  5. Verify secure communication settings
    In QRadar Admin UI, navigate to 'Deployment Configuration' > 'System Settings' and verify that TLS/SSL settings require valid certificate verification for all inbound and outbound communications
    Affected if Settings allow insecure connections or certificate verification is disabled for any management interface

You are affected if your QRadar SIEM is version 7.5.0 AND is network-accessible AND certificate validation is disabled or bypassed in the configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch or security update provided by IBM for QRadar SIEM 7.5 as referenced in IBM X-Force ID 275706. Review certificate validation configurations and ensure only trusted certificates are accepted.

Fix this in Qradar Security Information And Event Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-50949 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-50949 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data