Build App OnlineWordPress extension · Buildapp

CVE-2023-51479

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.0.20 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Abdul Hakeem Build App Online allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Build App Online: from n/a through 1.0.19.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Abdul Hakeem Build App Online allows authenticated users to escalate their privileges beyond what their assigned role should permit, likely due to missing or insufficient authorization checks on sensitive operations.

MitigationImplement proper role-based access control (RBAC) with consistent authorization checks on all privileged operations, ensuring users can only access functions appropriate to their assigned role.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Build App OnlineWordPress extension
Affected:< 1.0.20

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Build App Online installation
    Locate instances of Abdul Hakeem Build App Online running in your environment. This may be found on your web servers, application hosts, or through asset inventory scans.
    Affected if The application is present in your environment and is running.
  2. Determine installed version
    Check the currently deployed version of Build App Online. This is typically accessible through the application admin interface, version information endpoint, or deployment documentation. Compare the version number against the affected range: versions prior to 1.0.20 are vulnerable.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.0.20.
  3. Verify role-based access control configuration
    Examine the application's access control settings to confirm role-based access control (RBAC) is properly configured. Check if user roles are defined and assigned appropriately within the application.
    Affected if RBAC is not implemented or is misconfigured, allowing users to access functions beyond their assigned role.
  4. Test for authorization on privileged operations
    With a test account that has limited privileges, attempt to access or execute sensitive operations that should be restricted to higher-privilege roles (e.g., administrative functions, user management, data modification). Observe whether the application enforces role-based restrictions.
    Affected if A lower-privilege authenticated user can successfully perform actions reserved for higher-privilege roles.

Your environment is affected if Build App Online version is below 1.0.20 and users with lower privileges can access functions assigned to higher-privilege roles due to missing authorization checks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.0.20 or later
Fixed in 1.0.20
Interim mitigation

Implement proper role-based access control (RBAC) with consistent authorization checks on all privileged operations, ensuring users can only access functions appropriate to their assigned role.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.0.20

  1. Backup the current Build App Online application and database before proceeding with the upgrade
  2. Upgrade Build App Online to version 1.0.20 or later
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the application version and testing user role functionality
  4. Confirm that privilege escalation is no longer possible by testing the privilege boundaries

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Build App Online Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-51479 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-51479 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data