CVE-2023-5155
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Utarit Information Technologies SoliPay Mobile App allows SQL Injection. This issue affects SoliPay Mobile App: before 5.0.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in SoliPay Mobile App before version 5.0.8 allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input. The improper neutralization of special elements in SQL queries enables unauthorized database access, potentially leading to data exfiltration, modification, or complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.0.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SoliPay Mobile App is installedCheck the device for the presence of SoliPay Mobile application (Utarit Solipay Mobile). On Android, check Settings > Apps or the app drawer. On iOS, check the home screen or App Library.Affected if SoliPay Mobile App is found on the device
-
Determine installed SoliPay Mobile versionOpen the app store (Google Play Store or Apple App Store), search for SoliPay Mobile, and view the installed version. Alternatively, go to the app's about or settings section within the application itself to find the version number.Affected if Version displayed is less than 5.0.8
-
Confirm vulnerability applicabilityThis SQL injection flaw affects any SoliPay Mobile App version below 5.0.8 where the application processes user input through database queries. The vulnerability exists in the app's handling of unsanitized SQL inputs.Affected if Any SoliPay Mobile version prior to 5.0.8 is installed and actively used
If SoliPay Mobile App version is below 5.0.8, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.0.8
Upgrade SoliPay Mobile App to version 5.0.8 or later. Additionally, implement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions and apply input validation to prevent SQL injection.
5.0.8
- Update SoliPay Mobile App to version 5.0.8 or later through the official app store or vendor's distribution channel
- After updating, verify the application is running the patched version in the app settings or about section
- Test critical financial operations to ensure the application functions correctly after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-5155 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-5155 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data