CVE-2023-51602
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHoneywell Saia PG5 Controls Suite XML External Entity Processing Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Honeywell Saia PG5 Controls Suite. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of XML files. Due to the improper restriction of XML External Entity (XXE) references, a crafted document specifying a URI causes the XML parser to access the URI and embed the contents back into the XML document for further processing. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose information in the context of the current process. . Was ZDI-CAN-18591.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability is an XML External Entity (XXE) injection flaw in Honeywell Saia PG5 Controls Suite's XML parser. The parser does not properly restrict XXE references, allowing crafted XML files with malicious URI specifications to access internal resources and embed their contents back into the XML document for further processing, leading to information disclosure in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 2.3.193CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Saia PG5 Controls Suite installationCheck for the Saia PG5 installation directory, typically found under C:\Program Files\Honeywell\Saia PG5 or C:\Program Files (x86)\Honeywell\Saia PG5. Also check Windows Registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Honeywell\Saia PG5 for installation evidence.Affected if The product is present on the system and the XML parser is used to process untrusted XML files.
-
Identify installed Saia PG5 versionLocate the version information in the installation directory, typically in an About or Version file, or check the registry key for the installed version number.Affected if Any version number is returned, as the advisory states all versions are affected.
-
Locate XML configuration or data files processed by Saia PG5Search the Saia PG5 installation directory and project directories for .xml files that may be parsed by the application. Common locations include project folders, config subdirectories, and data directories used by the controls suite.Affected if XML files exist in the Saia PG5 directories and are processed by the application.
-
Inspect XML parser configuration for XXE protectionExamine Saia PG5 configuration files, XML parser settings, or any documentation related to XML processing. Look for whether external entities and DTD processing are explicitly disabled in the parser configuration.Affected if The XML parser configuration does NOT explicitly disable external entities and DTD processing, or the configuration cannot be verified as secure.
-
Review application logs for XML processing activityCheck Saia PG5 logs or event logs for evidence of XML file processing. Look for parser initialization or XML-related operations that may indicate the vulnerable code path is exercised.Affected if The application processes XML files during normal operation and the parser settings cannot be verified as secure.
If Saia PG5 Controls Suite is installed and processes XML files without secure parser configuration that explicitly disables external entities and DTDs, the environment is likely vulnerable to CVE-2023-51602 XXE injection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable external entity processing in the XML parser configuration and implement secure XML parsing settings (such as disabling DTDs and external entities) to prevent XXE attacks.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-51602 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-51602 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data