MattermostApplication

CVE-2023-5195

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-09-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.8.10 / 8.0.2 or later.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Mattermost fails to properly validate the permissions when soft deleting a team allowing a team member to soft delete other teams that they are not part of

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Mattermost lacks proper authorization checks in the soft delete team functionality, allowing authenticated team members to delete teams they are not members of. This is a broken access control vulnerability where the permission validation is missing or insufficient in the team deletion API endpoint.

MitigationApply the vendor patch that adds proper permission validation to ensure users can only soft delete teams they have appropriate permissions for.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MattermostApplication
Affected:>= 7.0.0, < 7.8.10>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.2>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Mattermost version
    Check the Mattermost server version by logging into the system and navigating to the System Console > About, or by running the command: `mattermost version` or checking the /api/v4/system/info endpoint
    Affected if The version falls within >= 7.0.0, < 7.8.10 OR >= 8.0.0, < 8.0.2 OR >= 8.1.0, < 8.1.1
  2. Confirm team API endpoints are accessible
    Verify that the Mattermost API is exposed and that user authentication is enabled. Check that API requests can be made using valid user credentials
    Affected if API endpoints are accessible and user authentication is functional
  3. Verify soft delete team functionality exists
    Confirm the Mattermost instance has team management features enabled. Check that teams can be managed through the system by users with appropriate access
    Affected if Teams functionality is present and the soft delete endpoint (typically /api/v4/teams/{team_id}) exists in the API

A user is affected if their Mattermost installation version is within the affected ranges AND the team management API is accessible to authenticated users, since the vulnerability allows any authenticated user to soft delete teams they are not members of.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.8.10 / 8.0.2 / 8.1.1 or later
Fixed in 7.8.108.0.28.1.1
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor patch that adds proper permission validation to ensure users can only soft delete teams they have appropriate permissions for.

Recommended fix High confidence

7.8.10, 8.0.2, or 8.1.1 (or later stable release)

  1. 1. Backup your Mattermost instance and database before upgrading.
  2. 2. Download the fixed version of Mattermost (7.8.10, 8.0.2, or 8.1.1) from the official Mattermost download page.
  3. 3. Follow the official Mattermost upgrade documentation for your deployment method (e.g., Ansible, Docker, Helm, or manual upgrade).
  4. 4. After upgrade, verify that the Mattermost server starts successfully.
  5. 5. Test that team deletion permissions now properly restrict users to only delete teams they are members of.
Caveat Patch releases typically do not introduce breaking changes; review release notes for any minor considerations

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Mattermost Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-5195 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-5195 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data