White LabelWordPress extension · Linksoftwarellc

CVE-2023-52128

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-01-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.9.0 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WhiteWP White Label – WordPress Custom Admin, Custom Login Page, and Custom Dashboard.This issue affects White Label – WordPress Custom Admin, Custom Login Page, and Custom Dashboard: from n/a through 2.9.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WhiteWP White Label WordPress plugin (versions through 2.9.0). Attackers can potentially trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended administrative actions via malicious requests.

MitigationImplement WordPress nonces (anti-CSRF tokens) on all state-changing admin actions and admin AJAX endpoints. Verify the WordPress nonce verification function wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() is used on all form submissions and AJAX requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
White LabelWordPress extension
Affected:<= 2.9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify White Label plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'White Label' or 'Linksoftwarellc White Label' in the plugin list.
    Affected if The plugin is present in the plugins list.
  2. Check installed plugin version
    In the Plugins list, click the plugin name or view the main plugin file (e.g., white-label.php) to read the Version header comment. Compare against the vulnerable range: <= 2.9.0.
    Affected if The version number displayed is 2.9.0 or lower.
  3. Identify admin AJAX endpoints
    Examine the main plugin PHP file for add_action calls registering AJAX handlers, typically with 'wp_ajax_' or 'wp_ajax_nopriv_' hooks. Common patterns: add_action('wp_ajax_white_label_action', 'function_name').
    Affected if AJAX action handlers exist in the plugin code.
  4. Check AJAX handlers for nonce verification
    Open the PHP file containing the AJAX handler functions. Search within each handler for wp_verify_nonce(), check_admin_referer(), or wp_create_nonce(). Look for code like: wp_verify_nonce($_REQUEST['_wpnonce'], 'action_name').
    Affected if The AJAX handler functions do NOT contain any nonce verification calls before processing the request.
  5. Check admin form submissions for nonce verification
    Search plugin PHP files for admin form handlers (functions processing $_POST or $_REQUEST data). Look for the presence of nonce verification functions in those handler functions.
    Affected if Form submission handlers lack wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() calls before processing form data.

If the White Label plugin version is 2.9.0 or lower AND admin AJAX endpoints or form handlers lack nonce verification code, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2023-52128.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.9.0
Interim mitigation

Implement WordPress nonces (anti-CSRF tokens) on all state-changing admin actions and admin AJAX endpoints. Verify the WordPress nonce verification function wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() is used on all form submissions and AJAX requests.

Fix this in White Label Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-52128 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-52128 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data