CmcApplication · Nozominetworks

CVE-2023-5253

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-01-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 23.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A missing authentication check in the WebSocket channel used for the Check Point IoT integration in Nozomi Networks Guardian and CMC, may allow an unauthenticated attacker to obtain assets data without authentication. Malicious unauthenticated users with knowledge on the underlying system may be able to extract limited asset information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an authentication bypass vulnerability in Nozomi Networks Guardian and CMC where the WebSocket channel used for Check Point IoT integration lacks proper authentication checks. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the WebSocket endpoint and retrieve limited asset information without providing any credentials.

MitigationApply vendor patches when available. As an immediate mitigation, review and restrict network access to the WebSocket endpoint, or disable the Check Point IoT integration if not required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CmcApplication
Affected:< 23.3.0
GuardianApplication
Affected:< 23.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed product version
    Locate the installed version of Nozomi Networks CMC or Guardian in the system administration interface or via command line (typically via 'version' command or system info page)
    Affected if The installed version is below 23.3.0 (e.g., 23.2.x, 23.1.x, earlier releases)
  2. Determine if Check Point IoT integration is configured
    Access the integrations or plugins configuration section within the Nozomi Networks admin interface and check for active Check Point IoT integration
    Affected if The Check Point IoT integration is enabled and configured on the system
  3. Verify WebSocket endpoint accessibility
    Attempt to access the WebSocket endpoint used for Check Point IoT (typically at /ws/iot or similar path under the Check Point integration URL) without providing authentication credentials using a WebSocket client tool
    Affected if The WebSocket connection is accepted and returns asset information without requiring authentication
  4. Review network exposure of management interface
    Check firewall rules, access control lists, or network segmentation settings to determine if the Nozomi management interface and its WebSocket endpoints are exposed to untrusted networks
    Affected if The management interface with the WebSocket endpoint is reachable from untrusted or external networks

A system is affected if it runs a version of CMC or Guardian below 23.3.0 AND has the Check Point IoT integration enabled, allowing unauthenticated access to asset data via the WebSocket endpoint.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 23.3.0 or later
Fixed in 23.3.0
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor patches when available. As an immediate mitigation, review and restrict network access to the WebSocket endpoint, or disable the Check Point IoT integration if not required.

Fix this in Cmc Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-5253 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-5253 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data