CVE-2023-5256
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn certain scenarios, Drupal's JSON:API module will output error backtraces. With some configurations, this may cause sensitive information to be cached and made available to anonymous users, leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability only affects sites with the JSON:API module enabled, and can be mitigated by uninstalling JSON:API. The core REST and contributed GraphQL modules are not affected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe JSON:API module in Drupal outputs verbose error backtraces that, when cached under certain configurations, can expose sensitive system information to anonymous users. This information disclosure can enable privilege escalation attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.7.0, < 9.5.11>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.11>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Drupal versionRun `drush status` or check the `core/lib/Drupal.php` file for the VERSION constant, or look at `composer.json` for the drupal/core versionAffected if The installed version falls outside the fixed ranges: not 9.5.11+, 10.0.11+, or 10.1.4+ (meaning it is within 8.7.0 to 9.5.10, 10.0.0 to 10.0.10, or 10.1.0 to 10.1.3)
-
Verify JSON:API module is enabledRun `drush pm-list --type=module --status=enabled` and look for jsonapi module, or check the modules/jsonapi directory for existence and status in the databaseAffected if The JSON:API module is installed and enabled on the site
-
Confirm anonymous users can access cached contentCheck the site configuration for caching settings that serve cached pages to anonymous users - examine settings.php for $settings['cache']['default'] and any JSON:API specific cache configuration, or test by making an authenticated request then an anonymous request to a JSON:API endpointAffected if Page caching is enabled for anonymous users and JSON:API endpoints are publicly accessible without authentication
-
Inspect error handling configurationCheck settings.php for $config['system.logging'] or $config['system.site'] error_level setting, and look for any custom error handlers that may expose backtracesAffected if Error display is set to verbose mode or backtraces are being included in JSON:API error responses
A site is affected if it runs a vulnerable Drupal version (8.7.0-9.5.10, 10.0.0-10.0.10, or 10.1.0-10.1.3) with the JSON:API module enabled, has page caching for anonymous users, and verbose error handling that can expose backtraces in cached responses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.1110.0.1110.1.4
Uninstall the JSON:API module if unused, or configure proper error handling and caching policies to prevent sensitive data from being cached and served to anonymous users.
Drupal 9.5.11, 10.0.11, or 10.1.4 (choose based on current branch)
- Identify the current Drupal version branch (9.x, 10.0.x, or 10.1.x) by running 'drush status' or checking the composer.json
- Back up the Drupal database and all files before proceeding
- Plan the upgrade: for Drupal 9.x upgrade to 9.5.11; for Drupal 10.0.x upgrade to 10.0.11; for Drupal 10.1.x upgrade to 10.1.4
- Test the upgrade in a staging environment first
- Run 'composer require drupal/core:^9.5.11 --no-update' (or appropriate version for your branch) in the project root
- Run 'composer update drupal/core --with-all-dependencies' to update Drupal core
- Clear Composer autoload: 'composer dump-autoload'
- Run database updates: 'drush updb' or 'php core/scripts/drupal update-db'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-5256 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-5256 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data