CVE-2023-53688
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNagios XI versions prior to 5.11.3 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) and cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via the Hypermap Replay component. An attacker can submit crafted input that is not properly validated or escaped, allowing injection of malicious script that executes in the context of a victim's browser (XSS). Additionally, the component does not enforce sufficient anti-CSRF protections on state-changing operations, enabling an attacker to induce authenticated users to perform unwanted actions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceNagios XI versions before 5.11.3 contain a combined XSS and CSRF vulnerability in the Hypermap Replay component. Attackers can inject malicious script through unsanitized user input that executes in authenticated users' browsers, while the lack of anti-CSRF protections allows attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended state-changing actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.11.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Nagios XI versionRun the following command to check the installed Nagios XI version: cat /usr/local/nagxi/etc/.build_info or check the Nagios XI admin interface under 'Admin > System Information'. Compare the version number to the affected range (< 5.11.3).Affected if The installed version is below 5.11.3 (e.g., 5.11.2, 5.11.1, 5.10.x, etc.)
-
Identify if Hypermap Replay component is installedCheck for the presence of the Hypermap Replay module in the Nagios XI installation. Look for files or directories related to 'hypermap' or 'replay' under /usr/local/nagiosxi/, or check the list of enabled components in the Nagios XI admin interface under 'Admin > System Extensions > Manage Components'.Affected if The Hypermap Replay component is installed and enabled on the system
-
Verify anti-CSRF protection status in Hypermap ReplayExamine the source code or configuration files for the Hypermap Replay component to determine if anti-CSRF tokens are implemented. This typically involves checking form submissions and AJAX requests within the hypermap module for the presence of token validation logic.Affected if Anti-CSRF token validation is missing from the Hypermap Replay component requests
-
Inspect Hypermap Replay input handlingReview the Hypermap Replay component code for input sanitization. Check how user-supplied data (such as map coordinates, labels, or replay parameters) is processed and whether output encoding is applied before rendering in the browser.Affected if User input in the Hypermap Replay component is not properly sanitized or encoded before display
A user is affected if they are running any Nagios XI version below 5.11.3 with the Hypermap Replay component enabled, as both conditions are required for the XSS and CSRF vulnerabilities to be exploitable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.11.3
Upgrade to Nagios XI 5.11.3 or later, which includes proper input validation, output encoding, and anti-CSRF token implementation for the Hypermap Replay component.
5.11.3
- Back up the current Nagios XI installation and database before proceeding with any upgrade
- Download Nagios XI version 5.11.3 from the official Nagios website (www.nagios.com)
- Run the official Nagios XI upgrade installer to update to version 5.11.3
- Follow standard Nagios XI post-upgrade procedures to ensure all services restart correctly
- Verify the Hypermap Replay component is functioning properly after the upgrade
- Confirm the XSS and CSRF vulnerabilities are remediated by testing the affected component
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-53688 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-53688 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data