CVE-2023-5592
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDownload of Code Without Integrity Check vulnerability in PHOENIX CONTACT MULTIPROG, PHOENIX CONTACT ProConOS eCLR (SDK) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to download and execute applications without integrity checks on the device which may result in a complete loss of integrity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability in PHOENIX CONTACT MULTIPROG and ProConOS eCLR SDK allows unauthenticated remote attackers to download and execute arbitrary applications on affected devices without any integrity verification. The lack of cryptographic signatures or checksums before execution enables complete compromise of device integrity.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if affected Phoenix Contact products are installedCheck system inventory or installed programs for 'Phoenix Contact Multiprog' or 'ProConOS eCLR' or 'eCLR' software packages. Look in Program Files, Program Files (x86), or use system inventory tools.Affected if Either Phoenix Contact Multiprog or ProConOS eCLR SDK is installed on the system, regardless of version.
-
Locate the ProConOS eCLR runtime or download serviceSearch for ProConOS or eCLR executable files, services, or runtime components on the system. Check installation directories, services list, and running processes for eCLR-related components.Affected if ProConOS eCLR runtime or associated download service is present on the system.
-
Check for code signing or integrity verification configurationExamine the ProConOS eCLR configuration files, settings, or control panel options for any code signing, checksum validation, or integrity verification settings. Look for options related to 'signature verification', 'checksum validation', or 'integrity check' in the product configuration.Affected if No cryptographic signature, HMAC, or checksum validation is enforced for downloaded applications, or such features are disabled or absent.
-
Verify if authentication is required for application downloadsReview the product security settings, user authentication configuration, or access control settings to determine whether unauthenticated or anonymous download operations are permitted.Affected if Download operations can be performed without authentication, or no access controls are enforced on the download interface.
-
Identify network-exposed download interfacesCheck network configuration, firewall rules, and open ports to determine if the product's download functionality is exposed to the network. Review any HTTP, FTP, or proprietary download endpoints.Affected if The application download interface is accessible from the network without requiring prior authentication.
The environment is affected if Phoenix Contact Multiprog or ProConOS eCLR is installed and the system allows unauthenticated application downloads without cryptographic signature or integrity verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement code signing and integrity verification (e.g., cryptographic signatures, HMAC, or checksum validation) for all downloaded applications. Additionally, require authentication for download operations and apply any vendor-provided patches or firmware updates.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation40.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $20,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-5592 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-5592 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data