CVE-2023-5627
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in NPort 6000 Series, making the authentication mechanism vulnerable. This vulnerability arises from the incorrect implementation of sensitive information protection, potentially allowing malicious users to gain unauthorized access to the web service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe NPort 6000 Series serial-to-Ethernet device servers have a vulnerability in their authentication mechanism due to incorrect handling of sensitive information. This could allow malicious users to gain unauthorized access to the web interface, likely through exposure or interception of credentials or session data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.21<= 1.21<= 1.21<= 1.21<= 1.21<= 1.21<= 1.21<= 1.21CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the NPort device modelAccess the web interface or check the device label/console output to confirm the exact model (Nport 6150, 6150 T, 6250, 6250 M Sc, 6250 S Sc, or 6250 T variants).Affected if The device is any NPort 6150 or 6250 series model listed in the affected products.
-
Check the firmware versionLog into the web interface and navigate to System Settings or Device Management to view the firmware version. Alternatively, use the console or SNMP to query the firmware version.Affected if The firmware version is 1.21 or lower.
-
Verify web interface accessibilityAttempt to access the device web interface over HTTP/HTTPS from the network. Check if port 80 or 443 (or custom web service ports) are listening and reachable.Affected if The web interface is exposed and reachable on the network.
-
Review authentication configurationExamine the web interface user accounts and authentication settings. Look for weak passwords, default credentials, or misconfigured access controls.Affected if Default credentials are in use or authentication is improperly configured.
-
Check for credential exposureInspect network traffic to/from the device using a packet capture tool. Look for credentials being transmitted in cleartext or predictable session handling.Affected if Credentials or session data are transmitted insecurely.
A user is affected if they have any NPort 6150 or 6250 series device running firmware version 1.21 or lower with an exposed web interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor firmware update when available, or implement compensating controls such as network segmentation, strong alternative authentication, and restricting web service access to trusted networks until the patch can be deployed.
Firmware version > 1.21 (check Moxa website for exact latest stable release)
- 1. Visit the official Moxa support website at www.moxa.com to download the latest firmware version for your NPort device model
- 2. Identify your specific NPort model (e.g., NPort 6150, NPort 6250 M Sc T, etc.)
- 3. Navigate to the product support or downloads section for your specific model
- 4. Download the firmware update file
- 5. Access the NPort web interface using administrator credentials
- 6. Navigate to the firmware upgrade or system maintenance section
- 7. Upload and apply the new firmware version
- 8. After upgrade, verify the firmware version displayed in the web interface matches the downloaded version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,896.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-5627 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-5627 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data