CVE-2023-6062
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn arbitrary file write vulnerability exists where an authenticated, remote attacker with administrator privileges on the Nessus application could alter Nessus Rules variables to overwrite arbitrary files on the remote host, which could lead to a denial of service condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an authenticated arbitrary file write vulnerability in Tenable Nessus. An attacker with administrator-level privileges can manipulate Nessus Rules variables to write to arbitrary file locations on the host system, potentially overwriting critical files and causing a denial of service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.5.7>= 10.6.0, < 10.6.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Nessus versionUse the Nessus command-line interface (nessuscli --version) or check the About section in the Nessus web interface to determine the exact version numberAffected if The installed version is lower than 10.5.7, or greater than or equal to 10.6.0 but lower than 10.6.3
-
Verify administrator access existsReview user accounts with administrator-level privileges in Nessus by accessing the 'Users' or 'Administration' section of the Nessus web interfaceAffected if There are administrator accounts present, especially unauthorized or unexpected ones
-
Inspect Nessus Rules configurationsNavigate to the Nessus Rules settings (typically found under 'Policies' or 'Advanced' settings in the Nessus web interface) and examine any configured rules that contain file path variables or custom variablesAffected if Nessus Rules are configured with variables that accept file path inputs or allow manipulation of file write locations
-
Check for suspicious rule modificationsReview audit logs or configuration change history for Nessus Rules, looking for recent changes to rule variables that could specify arbitrary file pathsAffected if Recent or unauthorized modifications to Nessus Rules variables are present, particularly those referencing system file paths outside the Nessus default directories
A user is affected if their Nessus installation version falls within the vulnerable range (< 10.5.7 or >= 10.6.0, < 10.6.3) AND administrator-level access is available to manipulate Nessus Rules configuration variables.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.5.710.6.3
Restrict administrator access to trusted personnel only, implement least-privilege principles, and apply vendor patches when available. Monitor Nessus Rules configurations for unauthorized changes.
Nessus 10.5.7 or Nessus 10.6.3 (or later)
- Identify current Nessus version via 'nessuscli --version' command or through the Nessus web UI (Help > About)
- Download the Nessus installation package for your operating system from the official Tenable downloads page (www.tenable.com/products/nessus/nessus-downloads)
- If currently on 10.5.x branch: upgrade to version 10.5.7
- If currently on 10.6.x branch: upgrade to version 10.6.3 or later
- Restart the Nessus service after installation completes
- Verify successful upgrade by checking the version shows 10.5.7 or >= 10.6.3
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-6062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-6062 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data