CVE-2023-6149
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedQualys Jenkins Plugin for WAS prior to version and including 2.0.11 was identified to be affected by a security flaw, which was missing a permission check while performing a connectivity check to Qualys Cloud Services. This allowed any user with login access to configure or edit jobs to utilize the plugin and configure potential a rouge endpoint via which it was possible to control response for certain request which could be injected with XXE payloads leading to XXE while processing the response data
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Qualys Jenkins Plugin for WAS before version 2.0.11 lacks proper permission checks during connectivity validation to Qualys Cloud Services. Any authenticated user with job configuration access can configure a rogue endpoint to control responses, which can be injected with XXE payloads leading to XML External Entity injection when the plugin processes the response data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.0.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Qualys WAS Plugin is installedNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'Qualys Web Application Scanning' or 'Qualys WAS' in the plugin listAffected if The plugin does not appear in the installed plugins list - not affected
-
Identify installed plugin versionIn the Installed Plugins list, locate the Qualys WAS plugin and note the Version column; or check Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > System Information for 'qualys-was-plugin' versionAffected if Version is 2.0.11 or lower - vulnerable to CVE-2023-6149
-
Check if job configuration access exists for non-admin usersNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Users and review which users have Job/Configure permissions; or review Matrix-based security settings under Manage Jenkins > Configure Global SecurityAffected if Non-admin users have Job/Configure permission - they could exploit this flaw
-
Verify plugin is configured with Qualys endpointNavigate to a Jenkins job that uses Qualys WAS, access its configuration page, and look for Qualys WAS build step or post-build action settings; check the 'Api Gateway' or 'Qualys Cloud Platform' URL fieldAffected if A Qualys API endpoint is configured in job settings - the plugin could be triggered to process malicious XML responses
A user is affected if the Qualys WAS plugin version is 2.0.11 or lower AND the plugin is configured for Qualys connectivity AND non-admin users have job configuration access, allowing them to inject XXE payloads via a rogue endpoint response.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade the Qualys Jenkins Plugin for WAS to version 2.0.11 or later, which includes proper permission checks and input validation to prevent XXE attacks.
Upgrade to Qualys WAS Plugin version 2.0.12 or later
- 1. Identify all Jenkins instances with Qualys WAS Plugin installed
- 2. Check current plugin version via Jenkins Plugin Manager (Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed)
- 3. If version is 2.0.11 or earlier, navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Advanced
- 4. Under 'Upload Plugin', upload the updated Qualys WAS Plugin (.hpi file) from Qualys support portal, or enable automatic updates and check for available updates
- 5. Restart Jenkins after plugin update
- 6. Verify plugin version shows as 2.0.12 or later in the Installed Plugins list
- 7. Test that Qualys WAS scans still function correctly after upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-6149 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-6149 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data