BoringApplication · Cloudflare

CVE-2023-6180

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-12-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The tokio-boring library in version 4.0.0 is affected by a memory leak issue that can lead to excessive resource consumption and potential DoS by resource exhaustion. The set_ex_data function used by the library did not deallocate memory used by pre-existing data in memory each time after completing a TLS connection causing the program to consume more resources with each new connection.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The tokio-boring library (a Rust async wrapper around BoringSSL for TLS) version 4.0.0 has a memory leak in its set_ex_data function. After each TLS connection completes, the function fails to deallocate memory used by pre-existing external data, causing memory to accumulate with every new connection and potentially leading to resource exhaustion and DoS.

MitigationUsers should upgrade to a patched version of tokio-boring once available. As a workaround, implement connection pooling with limits and monitor memory usage to detect exploitation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
BoringApplication
Affected:= 4.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if tokio-boring or Cloudflare Boring is present
    Search your project dependencies (Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock) for 'tokio-boring' or 'cloudflare-boring' entries. Also check any vendored dependencies or lockfiles.
    Affected if Either tokio-boring or Cloudflare Boring is listed as a dependency
  2. Determine the installed version
    Examine the version number in Cargo.lock or query the installed crate version using 'cargo tree' or your package manager. For Cloudflare Boring specifically, check if version 4.0.0 is installed.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 4.0.0 for either tokio-boring or Cloudflare Boring
  3. Verify TLS connections are being made
    Review your application code to confirm it uses the tokio-boring library to establish TLS connections. Check for usage of connect(), accept(), or similar TLS handshake functions from tokio-boring.
    Affected if Your application uses tokio-boring to handle TLS connections (incoming or outgoing)
  4. Monitor for memory accumulation
    Observe the process memory usage over time using system monitoring tools (such as top, htop, or process-specific memory profilers). Compare memory usage before and after multiple TLS connection cycles.
    Affected if Memory usage grows continuously with each new TLS connection and does not stabilize or decrease
  5. Check for connection pooling configuration
    Inspect your application configuration or code to determine if connection pooling is implemented. Look for connection pool size limits, reuse logic, or pool management code.
    Affected if Connection pooling with explicit limits is NOT configured, allowing unlimited new connections to accumulate unfreed memory

You are affected if your environment has tokio-boring or Cloudflare Boring version 4.0.0 installed and your application uses it to handle TLS connections, with memory accumulating over time.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Users should upgrade to a patched version of tokio-boring once available. As a workaround, implement connection pooling with limits and monitor memory usage to detect exploitation.

Fix this in Boring Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,760
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-6180 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-6180 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data