CVE-2023-6356
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in the Linux kernel's NVMe driver. This issue may allow an unauthenticated malicious actor to send a set of crafted TCP packages when using NVMe over TCP, leading the NVMe driver to a NULL pointer dereference in the NVMe driver and causing kernel panic and a denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel's NVMe driver when using NVMe over TCP. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send crafted TCP packets to trigger the NULL pointer dereference, causing kernel panic and resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.6= 9.2= 8.6_ppc64le= 9.2_ppc64le= 8.6_aarch64= 9.2_aarch64= 9.2_s390x= 8.0= 9.0= 8.6= 9.2= 8.6_aarch64= 9.2_aarch64= 8.6_s390x= 9.2_s390xCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if NVMe-TCP kernel module is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep nvmet' or 'lsmod | grep nvme' to see if the NVMe over TCP modules are currently loaded in memoryAffected if The module is loaded and the kernel version is within the affected range (8.0-8.6 or 9.0-9.2 for RHEL)
-
Identify active NVMe over TCP connections or listenersCheck for active NVMe-TCP sessions using 'nvme list' or inspect network listening ports for 4420/tcp (NVMe-TCP default port). Use 'ss -tlnp | grep 4420' or 'netstat -tlnp | grep 4420'Affected if NVMe over TCP connections or listeners are active on the system
-
Verify kernel version matches affected Red Hat releasesRun 'uname -r' to get the running kernel version and compare against affected RHEL versions: 8.0-8.6 or 9.0-9.2. For architecture-specific variants, also confirm the system architecture (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x)Affected if Kernel version falls within the affected RHEL version range (8.x or 9.x)
-
Confirm NVMe over Fabrics configuration existsCheck for NVMe over TCP configuration in /etc/nvme/ or review 'nvme list-subsys' output to see if any NVMe over Fabrics targets or controllers are configuredAffected if NVMe over TCP subsystems or controllers are configured and active
The system is affected if NVMe over TCP is actively used (module loaded with active connections) AND the kernel version is within the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0-8.6 or 9.0-9.2 range listed in the affected products.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Linux kernel security update that addresses this vulnerability. As a temporary workaround, restrict network access to NVMe over TCP ports or disable NVMe over TCP if not required.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-6356 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-6356 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data