CVE-2023-6554
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen access to the "admin" folder is not protected by some external authorization mechanisms e.g. Apache Basic Auth, it is possible for any user to download protected information like exam answers.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an access control vulnerability where the application's 'admin' folder lacks proper built-in authorization checks. When external mechanisms like Apache Basic Auth are not configured, any unauthenticated user can directly access and download sensitive files such as exam answers by directly requesting URLs within the admin directory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 15.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Tecnick Tcexam installationLocate the Tcexam application in your web server document root. Verify the presence of the /admin directory which is characteristic of this application.Affected if Tecnick Tcexam with its admin folder is present on the server
-
Determine installed versionFind the version file in the Tcexam installation (commonly version.php or similar) and read the version number. Compare it to 15.1.0.Affected if The installed version is lower than 15.1.0
-
Test admin folder web accessibilitySend an HTTP request directly to the admin directory URL (e.g., https://yourdomain.com/tcexam/admin/) without any credentials. Observe whether you receive an HTTP 200 response or are immediately allowed access.Affected if The admin directory returns HTTP 200 or allows access without requiring authentication
-
Check for external authentication on admin folderExamine web server configuration files (httpd.conf, .htaccess, virtual host configs) for the admin directory path. Look for directives like AuthType Basic, require valid-user, or IP-based Allow/Deny rules that would protect the folder.Affected if No Apache Basic Auth, IP restrictions, or other web server authentication is configured for the admin folder
-
Verify application-level authorization is absentAccess the admin folder directly via browser or curl without logging into the application. If sensitive files (such as exam data, answer sheets, or configuration files) can be downloaded without any login prompt, the application-level controls are missing.Affected if Sensitive files within the admin directory can be accessed without any authentication challenge
Your environment is affected if you are running Tecnick Tcexam version below 15.1.0 AND the admin folder is accessible over the web without Apache Basic Auth, IP restrictions, or application-level authentication protecting it.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1.0
Implement proper authentication and authorization controls on the admin folder, either through web server configuration (e.g., Apache Basic Auth, IP restrictions) or application-level access controls to ensure only authorized personnel can access sensitive resources.
15.1.0
- 1. Back up the current Tcexam installation and database before proceeding
- 2. Download Tcexam version 15.1.0 from the official tcexam.org source
- 3. Extract and install the new version, overwriting existing files while preserving configuration
- 4. Verify the admin folder now requires proper authentication
- 5. Test that unauthenticated users can no longer access protected exam information
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-6554 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-6554 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data