DeepfacelabApplication · Iperov

CVE-2023-6656

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-12-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A vulnerability was found in DeepFaceLab pretrained DF.wf.288res.384.92.72.22. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file DFLIMG/DFLJPG.py. The manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack may be launched remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-247364. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A deserialization vulnerability exists in DeepFaceLab's DFLIMG/DFLJPG.py file used for processing pretrained model files (DF.wf.288res.384.92.72.22). The vulnerability allows manipulation of deserialized data through malicious or crafted model files, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. The attack complexity is high and exploitation is known to be difficult.

MitigationSince DeepFaceLab is no longer supported, the recommended approach is to replace the affected component with actively maintained deepfake/face manipulation libraries that implement secure deserialization practices, or implement input validation and safe deserialization wrappers around the DFLJPG.py functionality if continued use is required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
DeepfacelabApplication
Affected:= df.wf.288res.384.92.72.22

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate DeepFaceLab installation
    Search for the DeepFaceLab installation directory, typically found in user home folders (e.g., ~/DeepFaceLab, C:\DeepFaceLab, or the folder where the tool was extracted)
    Affected if DeepFaceLab is not found on the system, then the environment is not affected
  2. Identify the vulnerable model file
    Look for the pretrained model file named 'DF.wf.288res.384.92.72.22' in the models folder (commonly in /model/ or /workspace/ within the DeepFaceLab directory)
    Affected if The file DF.wf.288res.384.92.72.22 exists in the DeepFaceLab directory tree, indicating the affected component is present
  3. Check for DFLIMG/DFLJPG.py
    Locate the DFLIMG or DFLJPG.py script file in the DeepFaceLab source code directory (typically in /core/ or /lib/ folder)
    Affected if The file DFLIMG/DFLJPG.py exists and is used for loading model files, confirming the vulnerable code path is present
  4. Verify active model processing
    Check if the DeepFaceLab model training or conversion pipeline has been executed with the affected model file, which would trigger the deserialization of DF.wf.288res.384.92.72.22
    Affected if Logs, workspaces, or recent session data indicate the specific model was loaded or processed using the vulnerable deserialization routine

If DeepFaceLab with the DF.wf.288res.384.92.72.22 model file is present and has been used to process model data, the environment is likely affected by this deserialization vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since DeepFaceLab is no longer supported, the recommended approach is to replace the affected component with actively maintained deepfake/face manipulation libraries that implement secure deserialization practices, or implement input validation and safe deserialization wrappers around the DFLJPG.py functionality if continued use is required.

Fix this in Deepfacelab Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-6656 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-6656 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data