CVE-2023-6886
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in xnx3 wangmarket 6.1. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Role Management Page. The manipulation leads to code injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-248246 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA code injection vulnerability exists in the Role Management Page component of xnx3 wangmarket version 6.1. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to inject malicious code, likely through insufficient input validation on role management parameters. A public exploit (VDB-248246) is available.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Wangmarket versionAccess the admin interface and navigate to System > About, or check the version file in the deployment directory if accessible via shell. Common locations include version.properties, a banner endpoint, or the admin dashboard footer.Affected if The installed version is exactly 6.1, as this is the only confirmed affected version.
-
Confirm Role Management component is accessibleLog into the Wangmarket admin panel and attempt to access the Role Management page, typically found under System Settings > Role Management or User Management > Roles.Affected if The Role Management page loads and is functional, indicating the vulnerable component is enabled.
-
Identify the role management endpointInspect web requests when accessing the Role Management page. Look for HTTP requests to endpoints containing patterns like /role/, /rolemanage/, or /admin/role/ in the URL.Affected if Requests to role management endpoints are successful and return role data, confirming the component is active.
-
Check for input validation on role parametersIf you have access to the underlying configuration or source, inspect the role management code for input validation routines. Look for lack of sanitization on parameters passed to role creation/editing functions.Affected if Role parameters accept special characters without sanitization, indicating insufficient input validation is present.
You are affected if the installed Wangmarket version is exactly 6.1 and the Role Management page is accessible and functional.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of xnx3 wangmarket if available; otherwise, restrict network access to the role management functionality and implement strict input validation on all role-related parameters.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-6886 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-6886 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data