CVE-2023-6891
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in PeaZip 9.4.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality in the library dragdropfilesdll.dll of the component Library Handler. The manipulation leads to uncontrolled search path. An attack has to be approached locally. Upgrading to version 9.6.0 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-248251. NOTE: Vendor was contacted early, confirmed the existence of the flaw and immediately worked on a patched release.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePeaZip 9.4.0 contains a DLL hijacking vulnerability in the dragdropfilesdll.dll library. The application uses an uncontrolled search path when loading this library, allowing a local attacker to place a malicious DLL in a location where the application will load it before the legitimate DLL, leading to arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed PeaZip versionOpen Windows Settings > Apps & Features, or run 'wmic product get name,version' or check the application's About/Help dialog to find the exact version numberAffected if Version is exactly 9.4.0 (other versions are not affected by this specific CVE)
-
Locate PeaZip installation directoryRight-click the PeaZip shortcut, select 'Open file location' or check the registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for the InstallLocationAffected if The installation directory path is identified for further inspection
-
Verify dragdropfilesdll.dll presenceCheck if dragdropfilesdll.dll file exists in the PeaZip installation directoryAffected if The DLL file is present in the application directory (required for the hijacking vulnerability to be exploitable)
-
Check directory write permissionsRight-click the PeaZip installation folder > Properties > Security tab. Verify if untrusted users or groups (such as Users or Everyone) have Write or Modify permissionsAffected if Untrusted users can write to the PeaZip installation directory, allowing them to place a malicious DLL that will be loaded by the application
A user is affected if they have PeaZip version 9.4.0 installed with dragdropfilesdll.dll present AND the application directory is writable by untrusted users or the application is run from an untrusted location such as a network share.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to PeaZip version 9.6.0 or later. Ensure the application directory is not writable by untrusted users and avoid running the application from untrusted locations such as network shares or recently extracted archives.
9.6.0
- Backup any important archives or data processed by Peazip
- Navigate to the official Peazip repository (peazip.github.io) or download page
- Download Peazip version 9.6.0 or later for your platform (Windows or Linux)
- Uninstall the current Peazip 9.4.0 installation
- Install the downloaded version 9.6.0
- Launch Peazip and verify the application runs without DLL loading errors
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA0.5 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-6891 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-6891 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data