CVE-2023-6919
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPath Traversal: '/../filedir' vulnerability in Biges Safe Life Technologies Electronics Inc. VGuard allows Absolute Path Traversal. This issue affects VGuard: before V500.0003.R008.4011.C0012.B351.C.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVGuard contains a path traversal vulnerability allowing absolute path traversal via '/../filedir' sequences. Attackers can use this to escape the intended directory and access sensitive files outside the web root, potentially exposing configuration files, credentials, or other system files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.c< 500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.c< 500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.c< 500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.c< 500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.c< 500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.c< 500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.c< 500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.cCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify VGuard device model and firmware versionAccess the device web interface or check the device status page to find the exact model name and firmware version number. Look for firmware version strings like '500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.c' or earlier.Affected if The firmware version is less than 500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.c for any Biges Vg variant (4c1a Lru, 4c1a Lrpu, 255a Bf, 255 Bv, 255 Df, 64c8rd Nvr, 4c1e Nvr, 8c1e Nvr).
-
Locate the VGuard file upload or download interfaceCheck the web management interface for file export, backup, log download, or configuration export features. These are typical paths where path traversal may be exploitable.Affected if The device has a web-accessible file transfer or export feature that accepts file path parameters.
-
Test for path traversal vulnerabilityIf file path parameters are observable, attempt a request with '/../' sequences (e.g., a URL parameter containing '../../../etc/passwd' or similar). Observe whether the application returns files from outside the intended directory.Affected if The application returns files from unintended directories when path traversal sequences are provided.
You are affected if your VGuard firmware version is below 500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.c AND the device exposes a web-accessible file access feature that accepts path parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped500.0003.r008.4011.c0012.b351.c
Upgrade VGuard to version V500.0003.R008.4011.C0012.B351.C or later. If upgrade is not immediately possible, implement strict input validation to reject path traversal sequences ('../') and restrict file access to intended directories.
V500.0003.R008.4011.C0012.B351.C or later
- 1. Identify the specific VGuard device model from the affected list (Vg 4c1a Lru, Vg 4c1a Lrpu, Vg 255a Bf, Vg 255 Bv, Vg 255 Df, Vg 64c8rd Nvr, Vg 4c1e Nvr, or Vg 8c1e Nvr)
- 2. Access the device management interface or contact Biges Safe Life Technologies Electronics Inc. for the firmware update
- 3. Obtain firmware version V500.0003.R008.4011.C0012.B351.C or later from the vendor
- 4. Backup current device configuration before performing firmware upgrade
- 5. Apply the firmware upgrade following the vendor's documented upgrade procedure
- 6. Verify the device is running the fixed firmware version after upgrade
- 7. Test to confirm the path traversal vulnerability is no longer exploitable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-6919 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-6919 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data