CVE-2023-7325
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAnheng Mingyu Operation and Maintenance Audit and Risk Control System up to 2023-08-10 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the xmlrpc.sock handler. The product accepts specially crafted XML-RPC requests that can be used to instruct the server to connect to internal unix socket RPC endpoints and perform privileged XML-RPC methods. An attacker able to send such requests can invoke administrative RPC methods via the unix socket interface to create arbitrary user accounts on the system, resulting in account creation and potential takeover of the bastion host. VulnCheck has observed this vulnerability being exploited in the wild as of 2025-10-30 at 00:30:17.837319 UTC.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAnheng Mingyu Operation and Maintenance Audit and Risk Control System contains an SSRF vulnerability in the xmlrpc.sock handler. Attackers can send specially crafted XML-RPC requests to instruct the server to connect to internal Unix socket RPC endpoints, bypassing normal access controls to invoke administrative RPC methods that create arbitrary user accounts, enabling full system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Anheng Mingyu Operation and Maintenance Audit and Risk Control System is installedLocate the application installation directory or check system services for the Mingyu system components; look for processes named 'mingyu', 'audit', or related binariesAffected if The system is running the Anheng Mingyu Operation and Maintenance Audit and Risk Control System
-
Verify the xmlrpc.sock endpoint is accessibleCheck for the presence of xmlrpc.sock file in the application directory, typically found in runtime or var directories; attempt a local curl or netcat connection to the socket if it existsAffected if The xmlrpc.sock file exists and is readable by the web service user
-
Confirm XML-RPC service is enabled and listeningReview application configuration files for xmlrpc enable settings; check network listeners or unix socket bindings for xmlrpc-related servicesAffected if XML-RPC functionality is enabled in the configuration and the service is running
-
Check network exposure of the xmlrpc interfaceReview firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, or application access controls that may allow external access to the XML-RPC endpointAffected if The xmlrpc.sock endpoint is reachable from untrusted networks without authentication
-
Audit XML-RPC request handling for socket connection capabilitiesExamine XML-RPC request logs or packet captures to identify attempts to connect to internal unix sockets; check if the XML parser allows socket path parametersAffected if The XML-RPC handler processes requests containing socket path parameters without validation
A user is affected if they run the Anheng Mingyu system with the xmlrpc.sock endpoint exposed and XML-RPC service enabled, allowing external or untrusted access to internal socket communication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict access to the xmlrpc.sock endpoint and implement strict authentication/authorization for all XML-RPC requests; apply network segmentation to prevent unauthorized access to internal Unix socket interfaces; deploy vendor patches when available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-7325 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-7325 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data