CVE-2024-0101
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNVIDIA Mellanox OS, ONYX, Skyway, MetroX-2 and MetroX-3 XC contain a vulnerability in ipfilter, where improper ipfilter definitions could enable an attacker to cause a failure by attacking the switch. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceNVIDIA Mellanox switch operating systems (Mellanox OS, ONYX, Skyway, MetroX-2/3 XC) contain a vulnerability in the ipfilter packet filtering component. Improperly configured or malformed ipfilter definitions can be exploited by an attacker to cause switch failure, resulting in denial of service. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation or incorrect rule definitions within the switch's firewall/packet filtering logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.11.2002< 8.1.4400< 8.2.2000< 3.10.4402< 18.2.2000CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the switch OS and versionRun 'show version' or 'show system' to determine the installed OS type (Mellanox OS, ONYX, MLNX-GW, or NVDA OS XC) and exact version numberAffected if The OS version falls below 3.11.2002 for Mellanox OS, below 8.1.4400 or 8.2.2000 for MLNX-GW, below 3.10.4402 for ONYX, or below 18.2.2000 for NVDA OS XC
-
Verify ipfilter is enabledRun 'show ipfilter status' or 'show running-config ipfilter' to determine if the ipfilter packet filtering feature is currently active on the switchAffected if ipfilter is enabled and actively processing traffic
-
Review ipfilter rule definitionsRun 'show ipfilter' or 'show ipfilter rules' to display all configured ipfilter rules. Inspect each rule definition for malformed syntax, missing required fields, invalid source/destination specifications, or improperly configured rule parametersAffected if Any ipfilter rule definitions are malformed, improperly configured, or contain invalid syntax that could trigger insufficient validation in the packet filtering logic
The switch is vulnerable if it runs an affected OS version AND has ipfilter enabled with potentially malformed or improperly validated rule definitions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.10.44023.11.20028.1.4400
Review and correct all ipfilter rule definitions on affected switches to ensure proper validation and remove any malformed rules. Consider updating to vendor-provided patches and verifying ipfilter configuration integrity.
Mlnx OS >= 3.11.2002 | Mlnx GW >= 8.2.2000 (or 8.1.4400+ for 8.1 branch) | ONYX >= 3.10.4402 | Nvda OS XC >= 18.2.2000
- 1. Identify the affected product (Mlnx OS, Mlnx GW, ONYX, or Nvda OS XC) running in your environment
- 2. Document the current installed version using the product's CLI (e.g., 'show version' or 'show boot')
- 3. For Mlnx OS: Schedule maintenance window and upgrade to version 3.11.2002 or later
- 4. For Mlnx GW: Upgrade to version 8.2.2000 or later (if running 8.1.x branch, upgrade to 8.1.4400 or later; if running 8.2.x, upgrade to 8.2.2000 or later)
- 5. For ONYX: Upgrade to version 3.10.4402 or later
- 6. For Nvda OS XC: Upgrade to version 18.2.2000 or later
- 7. After upgrade, verify ipfilter configuration is correct using 'show ipfilter' and review firewall rules
- 8. Test normal traffic flows to confirm the switch operates normally post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-0101 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-0101 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data