CVE-2024-0203
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Digits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 8.4.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'digits_save_settings' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the default role of registered users to elevate user privileges via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Digits WordPress plugin lacks nonce validation in its 'digits_save_settings' function, allowing unauthenticated attackers to craft forged requests that modify plugin settings. Specifically, attackers can change the default user registration role to an elevated privilege level by tricking administrators into clicking a malicious link, achieving privilege escalation without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 8.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Digits plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and check if the 'Digits' or 'Unitedover Digits' plugin is listed and active, or check the /wp-content/plugins/digits directory exists on the serverAffected if The Digits plugin is present and active in the WordPress installation
-
Identify installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin > Plugins, find the Digits plugin and note the version number displayed, or inspect the main plugin file (e.g., digits.php) and look for the 'Version:' header commentAffected if The installed version is 8.4.2 or lower
-
Verify the vulnerable function existsInspect the Digits plugin files, specifically searching for the 'digits_save_settings' function in the plugin source code to confirm it lacks nonce validation logicAffected if The 'digits_save_settings' function exists and does not contain nonce verification (look for 'check_admin_referer' or 'wp_verify_nonce' calls)
-
Check current default user registration roleGo to WordPress admin > Digits Settings > General (or similar) and examine the 'Default User Role' setting, or query the wp_options table for option_name 'digit_default_user_role'Affected if The default role is set to an elevated role such as Administrator, Editor, or Author (rather than the default Subscriber)
-
Audit recent role setting changesReview WordPress activity logs, server access logs, or database logs for recent modifications to the digit_default_user_role option, or compare current setting against known-good baselineAffected if The default user role was changed without administrator awareness or documentation
A user is affected if the Digits plugin version is 8.4.2 or lower AND the vulnerable settings function exists AND the default user registration role has been modified to an elevated privilege level.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade the Digits plugin to version 8.4.2 or later which includes proper nonce validation. As an interim measure, advise administrators not to click untrusted links, but this does not adequately mitigate the vulnerability.
Digits plugin version 8.4.3 or later
- 1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 3. Locate the 'Digits' plugin in the plugin list
- 4. Check if an update is available for the Digits plugin
- 5. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to upgrade to the fixed version
- 6. Alternatively, navigate to Dashboard > Updates and update all plugins including Digits
- 7. After updating, verify the 'digits_save_settings' function now includes proper nonce validation by reviewing plugin changelog or contacting vendor
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-0203 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-0203 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data