Endpoint Security Web ControlApplication · Trellix

CVE-2024-0310

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-01-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 10.7.0 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A content-security-policy vulnerability in ENS Control browser extension prior to 10.7.0 Update 15 allows a remote attacker to alter the response header parameter setting to switch the content security policy into report-only mode, allowing an attacker to bypass the content-security-policy configuration.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The ENS Control browser extension before version 10.7.0 Update 15 contains a content-security-policy vulnerability where remote attackers can manipulate response headers to switch CSP from enforced mode to report-only mode. This disables CSP protections and allows attackers to bypass restrictions for XSS, data injection, and other client-side attacks.

MitigationUpgrade to ENS Control browser extension version 10.7.0 Update 15 or later, which should contain the fix for preventing CSP header manipulation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Endpoint Security Web ControlApplication
Affected:< 10.7.0= 10.7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate ENS Control browser extension version
    In Chrome, go to chrome://extensions and enable Developer Mode, then find the ENS Control or Trellix Endpoint Security Web Control extension to view its version number. In Firefox, go to about:addons and find the extension in the list.
    Affected if installed version is less than 10.7.0 Update 15, or is exactly version 10.7.0 without the Update 15 patch applied
  2. Verify extension version in Trellix management console
    Log into the Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) or central management console and search for the ENS Control extension deployment status to confirm the exact version number deployed.
    Affected if deployed version shows as any version before 10.7.0 Update 15 or shows 10.7.0 without the Update 15 notation
  3. Confirm CSP enforcement status in browser
    Open browser developer tools (F12), go to the Security tab, and inspect whether Content-Security-Policy is reported as enforced or report-only for pages loaded while ENS Control is active.
    Affected if CSP shows as report-only mode when it should be enforced, indicating possible manipulation of CSP headers by the vulnerable extension

You are affected if the ENS Control browser extension version is any version before 10.7.0 Update 15, or is exactly 10.7.0 without the Update 15 patch applied.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 10.7.0 or later
Fixed in 10.7.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to ENS Control browser extension version 10.7.0 Update 15 or later, which should contain the fix for preventing CSP header manipulation.

Recommended fix High confidence

10.7.0 Update 15

  1. Navigate to the Trellix Endpoint Security management console
  2. Locate the Web Control component or browser extension settings
  3. Check the current version of ENS Control browser extension
  4. If the version is below 10.7.0 Update 15, initiate an update to version 10.7.0 Update 15 or later
  5. Verify the update was successfully applied by checking the version number post-update

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Endpoint Security Web Control Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-0310 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-0310 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data