CVE-2024-0323
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe FTP server used on the B&R Automation Runtime supports unsecure encryption mechanisms, such as SSLv3, TLSv1.0 and TLS1.1. An network-based attacker can exploit the flaws to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks or to decrypt communications between the affected product clients.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe FTP server component in B&R Automation Runtime supports deprecated and cryptographically weak encryption protocols (SSLv3, TLSv1.0, TLS1.1). These outdated protocols contain known vulnerabilities that allow a network-based attacker to perform man-in-the-middle attacks or decrypt intercepted communications, exposing sensitive data in transit.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= i4.93CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify FTP server is enabledInspect the Automation Runtime configuration or project settings to confirm the FTP server component is active. Check runtime logs or system services for an active FTP listener on ports 20/21 or configured FTP ports.Affected if FTP server is enabled and running on the affected Automation Runtime version (<= i4.93)
-
Confirm Automation Runtime versionLocate the Automation Runtime installation or system information panel. Check the runtime version displayed in the engineering software (Automation Studio) or on the controller's system info screen.Affected if Version is i4.93 or earlier (any version <= i4.93)
-
Inspect TLS/SSL protocol settings for FTPAccess the FTP server configuration in Automation Studio or the controller's security settings. Review the enabled protocol list for the FTP service to identify if SSLv3, TLSv1.0, or TLSv1.1 are listed as allowed options.Affected if SSLv3, TLSv1.0, or TLSv1.1 appear in the enabled protocols list for the FTP server
-
Check cipher suite configurationExamine the cipher suite settings associated with the FTP server component. Look for weak or deprecated cipher configurations that rely on the affected protocol versions.Affected if Weak cipher suites tied to SSLv3, TLSv1.0, or TLSv1.1 are configured or selected by default
A system is affected if it runs Automation Runtime version <= i4.93 with the FTP server enabled and has SSLv3, TLSv1.0, or TLSv1.1 protocols available or configured for the FTP service.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable SSLv3, TLSv1.0, and TLSv1.1 on the FTP server and enforce TLSv1.2 or higher. If the affected product does not support modern TLS versions, contact B&R for a firmware update.
Automation Runtime > i4.93 (contact B&R for exact latest stable version)
- 1. Identify all B&R Automation Runtime deployments currently running version i4.93 or earlier
- 2. Contact B&R Automation technical support or check their official website for the latest Automation Runtime version
- 3. Before upgrading, backup all current configurations and project data
- 4. Plan maintenance window as upgrade may require system restart
- 5. Obtain the upgrade package from official B&R sources (www.br-automation.com)
- 6. Follow B&R's official upgrade procedure documentation for Automation Runtime
- 7. After upgrade, verify the FTP server no longer accepts SSLv3, TLSv1.0, or TLS1.1 connections
- 8. Test that legitimate clients can connect using TLSv1.2 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-0323 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-0323 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data