CVE-2024-0491
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Huaxia ERP up to 3.1. Affected is an unknown function of the file src/main/java/com/jsh/erp/controller/UserController.java. The manipulation leads to weak password recovery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 3.2 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-250596.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA weak password recovery mechanism in Huaxia ERP's UserController.java (versions up to 3.1) allows remote attackers to potentially reset or discover user passwords through a flawed recovery workflow. The vulnerability is exploitable over the network without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Huaxia ERP is deployedCheck for presence of Huaxia ERP application files, or look for web application responses containing 'Huaxia' or 'ERP' in headers/title, or check running services on common application ports (8080, 8443, 80, 443)Affected if The system is running Huaxia ERP web application
-
Determine the installed Huaxia ERP versionCheck application configuration files, about page, or API endpoint that reveals version information; common paths include version files in the WEB-INF or config directories, or the application's login/about pageAffected if The installed version is 3.1 or earlier (e.g., 3.0, 2.x, 1.x)
-
Verify the password recovery endpoint is accessibleAttempt to access the password recovery URL (typically /user/forgotPassword, /user/resetPassword, or similar paths under the UserController), or check web application firewall logs for requests to password recovery endpointsAffected if The password recovery endpoint is exposed and reachable over the network without authentication
-
Check UserController.java configurationIf code access is available, review UserController.java for the password recovery implementation; look for weak token generation, predictable values, or lack of proper validation in the reset flowAffected if The password recovery mechanism uses weak or predictable tokens, lacks rate limiting, or has insufficient validation
-
Test password recovery workflowIf authorized, initiate a password recovery request and observe whether the reset token is predictable, emailed in plain text, or uses weak validation (e.g., no expiration, no secret questions)Affected if The recovery mechanism allows password reset without proper identity verification or uses weak security controls
The environment is affected if Huaxia ERP version 3.1 or earlier is running and the password recovery functionality is accessible over the network without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Huaxia ERP from version 3.1 or earlier to version 3.2 or later, which contains the security fix for the weak password recovery vulnerability.
3.2
- Backup the current Huaxia ERP database and application files before upgrading
- Download Huaxia ERP version 3.2 or later from the official vendor source
- Stop the Huaxia ERP application service
- Replace the existing application files with the new version 3.2 files
- Run any database migration scripts if provided with the upgrade package
- Restart the Huaxia ERP application service
- Verify the upgrade was successful by logging into the application
- Test the password recovery functionality to confirm the vulnerability is fixed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-0491 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-0491 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data