CVE-2024-0949
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authentication, Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties, Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability in Talya Informatics Elektraweb allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects Elektraweb: before v17.0.68.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceTalya Informatics Elektraweb before v17.0.68 contains multiple critical security flaws allowing unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication. The vulnerability chain combines hard-coded credentials embedded in the application, publicly accessible files or directories, and missing authentication checks on sensitive resources. An attacker with network access can exploit these combined weaknesses to gain unauthorized access to the web application without valid credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Elektraweb versionLocate the application version information - check the web interface login page source, about page, or configuration files for version metadata. Common locations include: version files, config.xml, or the main application binaries.Affected if The installed version is any version before 17.0.68 (e.g., 17.0.60, 16.x, 15.x)
-
Search for hard-coded credentialsInspect application source code, configuration files, and scripts for embedded usernames and passwords. Search for patterns like 'password=', 'credentials=', or hard-coded database connection strings within the application deployment directory.Affected if Any hard-coded credentials, default passwords, or embedded secrets are found in the application files
-
Identify publicly accessible directoriesReview web server configuration and application directory structure. Check if sensitive directories such as /admin, /config, /backup, or /data are accessible without authentication via HTTP requests.Affected if Sensitive directories or administrative interfaces are accessible without requiring authentication
-
Verify authentication on sensitive endpointsAttempt to access sensitive application resources (such as administrative functions, user data APIs, or configuration pages) directly via HTTP requests without providing valid credentials.Affected if Sensitive resources or administrative functions can be accessed without authentication
-
Check for exposed backup or configuration filesProbe for commonly exposed file names such as backup.zip, config.bak, .sql dumps, or .git directories accessible via the web root.Affected if Backup files, configuration backups, or source code repositories are publicly accessible via the web server
A user is affected if their Elektraweb installation is any version before 17.0.68 AND exhibits any of the hard-coded credentials, missing authentication checks, or publicly accessible sensitive files described in the CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Elektraweb to version 17.0.68 or later. Prior to upgrade, audit the application for exposed sensitive files and remove any hard-coded credentials. Implement proper authentication mechanisms and restrict access to administrative resources.
v17.0.68 or later
- Identify all deployments of Talya Informatics Elektraweb in the environment
- Check the current installed version of Elektraweb
- Create a complete backup of the Elektraweb installation and associated database
- Upgrade Elektraweb to version 17.0.68 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
- Test that authentication mechanisms are functioning correctly after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-0949 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-0949 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data