CVE-2024-10081
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCodeChecker is an analyzer tooling, defect database and viewer extension for the Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy. Authentication bypass occurs when the API URL ends with Authentication. This bypass allows superuser access to all API endpoints other than Authentication. These endpoints include the ability to add, edit, and remove products, among others. All endpoints, apart from the /Authentication is affected by the vulnerability. This issue affects CodeChecker: through 6.24.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCodeChecker versions through 6.24.1 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where requests to API URLs ending with 'Authentication' bypass the authentication mechanism entirely. This allows unauthenticated attackers to gain superuser access to all other API endpoints, enabling them to add, edit, and remove products and perform other privileged operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify CodeChecker installation and versionRun 'codechecker --version' or check the installed package version via pip list or system package managerAffected if The installed version is lower than 6.24.2 (e.g., 6.24.1, 6.24.0, etc.)
-
Determine if CodeChecker web/API server is runningCheck for running processes: 'ps aux | grep codechecker' or check if ports (default 8001/8002) are listening via 'netstat -tlnp | grep -E "8001|8002"'Affected if The CodeChecker web server or API server process is actively running and listening on network ports
-
Verify web interface is network-accessibleAttempt to access the CodeChecker web interface from a non-localhost location, or review firewall/network configurations to confirm accessibilityAffected if The API/web interface is accessible from non-trusted networks or untrusted users can reach the service
-
Test for authentication bypass via URL manipulationSend a crafted request to any API endpoint (such as /products, /users, or /configurations) using a URL path that ends with 'Authentication' (e.g., /products/Authentication or /api/config/Authentication)Affected if The request bypasses authentication and returns valid API data without providing credentials or a valid session token
-
Confirm superuser access via bypassAttempt privileged operations such as adding, modifying, or deleting products/users through the bypassed endpoint using a tool like curl or the API without authenticationAffected if Unauthenticated requests through the manipulated URL path succeed in performing administrative operations
You are affected if running CodeChecker version 6.24.1 or earlier AND the CodeChecker web/API server is network-accessible, allowing URL-based authentication bypass to grant unauthorized superuser access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.24.2
Upgrade CodeChecker to version 6.24.2 or later. Until then, restrict network access to the CodeChecker API and implement additional authentication layer at the infrastructure level (e.g., API gateway with forced authentication).
6.24.2
- Check the currently installed CodeChecker version using 'CodeChecker version' or your package manager
- Backup your CodeChecker database and configuration files before upgrading
- Upgrade CodeChecker to version 6.24.2 or later using your package manager or build system (e.g., pip install --upgrade codechecker for pip-based installs, or pull the latest release from the GitHub repository)
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
- Restart any CodeChecker services to ensure the new version is loaded
- Test that authentication is properly enforced on API endpoints
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10081 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10081 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data