CVE-2024-10202
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdministrative Management System from Wellchoose has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing remote attackers with regular privileges to inject and execute arbitrary OS commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Wellchoose Administrative Management System contains an OS Command Injection vulnerability. Attackers with regular (non-administrative) user privileges can inject arbitrary OS commands through unsanitized input that gets passed to system shell execution calls, potentially achieving full system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Wellchoose Administrative Management System is installedSearch for Wellchoose application files, processes, or services on the server. Check for web server configurations hosting this application, or look for its characteristic directory structure if installed on a local system.Affected if The application is present and running on the system
-
Verify the web management interface is exposedCheck if the application web port is listening and accessible from network. Identify the HTTP/HTTPS endpoint where the application is hosted.Affected if The management interface is network-accessible (even internally)
-
Check for existing command injection attemptsReview web server access logs, application logs, and system audit logs for suspicious patterns such as shell metacharacters (;, |, &, $, `, ||, &&) in parameters, unusual commands being executed, or unexpected system calls.Affected if Logs show evidence of command injection attempts or successful unauthorized command execution
-
Inspect for unauthorized files or scriptsExamine web application directories for newly created or unexpected scripts, binaries, or files that may indicate successful exploitation. Check /tmp, /var/tmp, and application upload directories for suspicious files.Affected if Unexpected scripts or binaries exist that were not deployed as part of the application
If Wellchoose Administrative Management System is installed and its web interface is accessible, the system is potentially affected since all versions contain the command injection flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSanitize all user input and avoid passing untrusted data to system shell functions; replace shell command execution with parameterized APIs or whitelist-based input validation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10202 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10202 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data