Heap-based Buffer OverflowWeakness · CWE-122

CVE-2024-10204

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Heap-based Buffer Overflow and Uninitialized Variable vulnerabilities exist in the X_B and SAT file reading procedure in eDrawings from Release SOLIDWORKS 2024 through Release SOLIDWORKS 2025. These vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code while opening a specially crafted X_B or SAT file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Heap-based Buffer Overflow and Uninitialized Variable vulnerabilities exist in eDrawings' X_B and SAT file parsing routines. The buffer overflow allows overwriting heap memory when parsing specially crafted files, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution. The uninitialized variable could lead to unpredictable behavior or information disclosure.

MitigationDo not open untrusted or unverified X_B or SAT files in eDrawings. Apply vendor-provided patches for SOLIDWORKS 2024 and 2025 releases when available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Find the eDrawings installation directory
    Search for the eDrawings executable (eDrawings.exe) on the system using file explorer or command: dir /s /b C:\eDrawings.exe 2>nul
    Affected if eDrawings is installed on the machine
  2. Determine the installed eDrawings version
    Right-click the eDrawings.exe file, select Properties, and view the Details tab for the Product version field
    Affected if The version shown does not match a patched release or cannot be determined
  3. Confirm eDrawings handles X_B or SAT files
    Open eDrawings, go to File > Open, and verify that .x_b and .sat file extensions appear in the supported file types dropdown or filter
    Affected if X_B and SAT file types are listed as supported formats
  4. Check for recent X_B or SAT file activity
    Review Windows recent documents, temporary folders, or the application's recent files list for any opened .x_b or .sat files
    Affected if Any untrusted or unknown X_B or SAT files have been opened in eDrawings

A user is affected if eDrawings is installed with an unpatched version and has the capability to open X_B or SAT files, especially if such files have been opened from untrusted sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Do not open untrusted or unverified X_B or SAT files in eDrawings. Apply vendor-provided patches for SOLIDWORKS 2024 and 2025 releases when available.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Latest SOLIDWORKS 2025 Service Pack or subsequent release (post-SOLIDWORKS 2025)

  1. 1. Identify the current installed version of eDrawings by opening eDrawings and navigating to Help > About eDrawings
  2. 2. Visit the official SOLIDWORKS support website at www.3ds.com or search for SOLIDWORKS eDrawings security updates
  3. 3. Download and install the latest eDrawings version or service pack that includes the CVE-2024-10204 security fix
  4. 4. Verify the installation was successful by checking the version number in Help > About eDrawings matches the patched release
Caveat Minor - Verify compatibility with existing SOLIDWORKS version and review release notes for any workflow changes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,840
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10204 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10204 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data