Incorrect Permission AssignmentWeakness · CWE-732

CVE-2024-10209

HIGH · 8.5 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-03-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in the file system used in B&R APROL <4.4-01 may allow an authenticated local attacker to read and alter the configuration of another engineering or runtime user.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

B&R APROL versions prior to 4.4-01 contain incorrect file system permissions that allow an authenticated local attacker to access and modify configuration files belonging to other engineering or runtime users, enabling potential privilege escalation and tampering of critical system settings.

MitigationUpgrade B&R APROL to version 4.4-01 or later. Additionally, audit and correct file system permissions on configuration directories to ensure users cannot access other users' files.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify B&R APROL installation and version
    Locate the APROL installation directory and check version information. Common locations include /opt/br_aprol, /usr/local/aprol, or check system inventory/diagnostics. Look for version file or use 'braprol -v' if available.
    Affected if Installed version is prior to 4.4-01 (e.g., 4.3-xx, 4.2-xx, etc.)
  2. Locate configuration directories
    Identify configuration directories used by APROL. Typical paths include <install_path>/Config, <install_path>/par, or /etc/aprol. Check for directories containing user-specific or system configuration files.
    Affected if Configuration directories exist and are owned by multiple different users or contain mixed ownership
  3. Verify file permission boundaries
    Use 'ls -la <config_dir>' to list permissions on configuration directories. Check if directory permissions allow world-readable/writeable access (rwxrwxrwx) or if group permissions grant access to users outside the intended owner.
    Affected if Permissions show 'other' users have read (r--) or write (rwx) access to config directories
  4. Test cross-user file access
    As a non-privileged authenticated user, attempt to read or modify configuration files belonging to a different user (e.g., 'ls -la ~otheruser/config' or 'cat ~otheruser/config/system.cfg').
    Affected if Authenticated users can access or modify configuration files owned by other users
  5. Check for mixed ownership in config paths
    Run 'find <aprol_config_path> -user root -o -user aprol -o -user operator 2>/dev/null | head -20' to identify if config files are owned by different users without proper isolation.
    Affected if Configuration files are owned by multiple different users without proper permission separation

You are affected if APROL version is prior to 4.4-01 AND configuration directories/files grant unauthorized access to authenticated local users outside their intended scope.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade B&R APROL to version 4.4-01 or later. Additionally, audit and correct file system permissions on configuration directories to ensure users cannot access other users' files.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10209 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10209 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data