CVE-2024-10283
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Tenda RX9 and RX9 Pro 22.03.02.20. Affected by this issue is the function sub_4337EC of the file /goform/SetNetControlList. The manipulation of the argument list leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in Tenda RX9/RX9 Pro router web interface (function sub_4337EC in /goform/SetNetControlList). The 'list' parameter is not properly bounds-checked before being copied to a stack buffer, allowing remote attackers to overflow the stack and potentially achieve code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 22.03.02.20CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelAccess the router's web admin interface or check the device label. Confirm it is a Tenda RX9 or RX9 Pro model.Affected if The device is NOT a Tenda RX9 or RX9 Pro router.
-
Check the firmware versionLog into the router web interface and navigate to System Settings or Administration > Firmware Update. Alternatively, check the version via the device status page or by querying the device's sysinfo endpoint.Affected if The firmware version is exactly 22.03.02.20. Versions other than 22.03.02.20 are NOT affected by this specific CVE.
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint existsAttempt to access the URL /goform/SetNetControlList on the router's web interface (e.g., http://<router-ip>/goform/SetNetControlList). A 404 response indicates the endpoint may not exist; a different response suggests it is present.Affected if The /goform/SetNetControlList endpoint responds and accepts the 'list' parameter.
-
Check if remote web management is enabledIn the router web interface, go to Advanced Settings > Remote Management or Administration > Remote Access. Verify whether remote access to the web admin interface is enabled.Affected if Remote web management is enabled and the router is accessible from external networks (WAN).
You are affected if you have a Tenda RX9 or RX9 Pro router running firmware version 22.03.02.20 with the /goform/SetNetControlList endpoint present and the web interface accessible from your network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware update if available; otherwise disable remote web management, restrict access to LAN only, or implement network-level filtering to block external access to the router's admin interface.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10283 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10283 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data