Ce21 SuiteWordPress extension · Ce21

CVE-2024-10294

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The CE21 Suite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'ce21_single_sign_on_save_api_settings' function in versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change plugin settings.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The CE21 Suite WordPress plugin versions up to 2.2.0 lacks a capability check on the ce21_single_sign_on_save_api_settings function, allowing unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via the affected function. This is a broken access control vulnerability where the AJAX or form handler does not verify the user has appropriate permissions before saving configuration data.

MitigationUpdate the CE21 Suite plugin to a version beyond 2.2.0 that includes the capability check, or implement a WordPress capability check (e.g., current_user_can('manage_options')) before executing the settings save routine.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ce21 SuiteWordPress extension
Affected:<= 2.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check the installed plugin version
    Locate the CE21 Suite plugin files in your WordPress installation (typically in wp-content/plugins/) and inspect the main plugin file's header to find the Version field. Alternatively, check via WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins.
    Affected if The version listed is 2.2.0 or lower, meaning the plugin lacks the capability check fix.
  2. Locate the vulnerable function
    Search the plugin source code for the function named 'ce21_single_sign_on_save_api_settings'. This function handles saving the plugin's API settings.
    Affected if The function exists in the plugin code, indicating the potentially vulnerable handler is present.
  3. Check AJAX handler registration
    Search the plugin for wp_ajax or wp_ajax_nopriv hooks that call the settings save function. Look for lines like 'add_action("wp_ajax_ce21_single_sign_on_save_api_settings", ...)' or similar.
    Affected if An AJAX handler is registered without a capability check, or uses wp_ajax_nopriv_ (allowing unauthenticated access).
  4. Inspect the function for permission checks
    Examine the ce21_single_sign_on_save_api_settings function code directly. Look for calls to current_user_can() or similar WordPress capability verification functions near the beginning of the function.
    Affected if No capability check (such as current_user_can('manage_options')) is found at the start of the function before any settings are saved.

If your installed version is 2.2.0 or lower AND the save function lacks a current_user_can() permission check, your site is vulnerable to unauthenticated settings modification.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.2.0
Interim mitigation

Update the CE21 Suite plugin to a version beyond 2.2.0 that includes the capability check, or implement a WordPress capability check (e.g., current_user_can('manage_options')) before executing the settings save routine.

Fix this in Ce21 Suite Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10294 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10294 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data