CVE-2024-10380
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in SourceCodester Petrol Pump Management Software 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /admin/ajax_product.php. The manipulation of the argument drop_services leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in SourceCodester Petrol Pump Management Software 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the drop_services parameter in /admin/ajax_product.php. The lack of input sanitization or parameterized queries enables attackers to manipulate database queries, potentially exposing or exfiltrating sensitive data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify software installationLocate the SourceCodester or Mayurik Petrol Pump Management Software installation directory and check version information in any version file, about page, or footer of the applicationAffected if The installed version is Petrol Pump Management Software version 1.0
-
Confirm vulnerable file existsCheck for the presence of the file /admin/ajax_product.php in the web root directoryAffected if The file /admin/ajax_product.php exists in the application directory
-
Inspect drop_services parameter handlingOpen /admin/ajax_product.php and search for code handling the drop_services parameter, look for direct inclusion in SQL queries without prepare() or bindParam() callsAffected if The drop_services parameter is used directly in SQL queries without parameterized queries or input sanitization
-
Check admin panel accessibilityAttempt to access the /admin/ endpoint of the application or verify the web server configuration allows access to this pathAffected if The /admin/ajax_product.php endpoint is accessible over the network without additional authentication barriers
The environment is affected if Petrol Pump Management Software version 1.0 is running with the /admin/ajax_product.php file present and the drop_services parameter is handled without parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with prepared statements/parameterized queries in ajax_product.php, implement proper input validation for the drop_services parameter, and apply vendor patches when available. If no patch exists, consider disabling the affected functionality until a secure implementation is deployed.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10380 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10380 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data