CVE-2024-10441
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper encoding or escaping of output vulnerability in the system plugin daemon in Synology BeeStation OS (BSM) before 1.1-65374 and Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2-64570-4, 7.2.1-69057-6 and 7.2.2-72806-1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an output encoding vulnerability in the Synology system plugin daemon that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. The improper encoding/escaping means user-supplied or external input is not being properly sanitized before being processed or executed, likely allowing command injection through the daemon.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.1>= 7.2, < 7.2-64570-4>= 7.2.1-69057, < 7.2.1-69057-6>= 7.2.2, < 7.2.2-72806-1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the BeeStation OS versionAccess the BeeStation management interface and navigate to Control Panel > System > System Status, or run 'grep -i version /etc/*release' via SSH to determine the installed BeeStation OS versionAffected if The installed version is 1.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, or 1.1 (any version before 1.1-65374)
-
Identify the DSM versionLog into DSM and go to Control Panel > System > System Information, or run 'cat /etc/VERSION' via SSH to check the DSM build numberAffected if The DSM build number falls within any of these ranges: 7.2 to 7.2-64570-3, 7.2.1-69057 to 7.2.1-69057-5, or 7.2.2 to 7.2.2-72806-0
-
Locate the system plugin daemon processRun 'ps aux | grep -i syno.system.plugin' or 'systemctl list-units | grep -i system.plugin' via SSH to identify if the Synology system plugin daemon is runningAffected if The daemon process is active and exposed to network requests
-
Check for suspicious daemon network listenersRun 'netstat -tulnp | grep -E "(5000|5001|3000)"' or inspect the firewall configuration to see which services are listening on external interfaces, focusing on the system plugin service portsAffected if The system plugin daemon is bound to a non-localhost interface or is accessible from the network
You are affected if your BeeStation OS is version 1.0-1.1, or your DSM is version 7.2 before build 64570-4, 7.2.1 before build 69057-6, or 7.2.2 before build 72806-1, AND the system plugin daemon is running and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.2.1-69057-67.2.2-72806-17.2-64570-4
Apply the vendor patches: update BeeStation OS to version 1.1-65374 or later, and DSM to 7.2-64570-4, 7.2.1-69057-6, or 7.2.2-72806-1 or later. Consider network segmentation to limit exposure until patching is complete.
BeeStation OS: 1.1-65374 or later; DSM 7.2: 7.2-64570-4 or later; DSM 7.2.1: 7.2.1-69057-6 or later; DSM 7.2.2: 7.2.2-72806-1 or later
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Synology BeeStation OS (BSM) or DiskStation Manager (DSM) from the control panel.
- 2. For BeeStation OS users: Upgrade to version 1.1-65374 or later from the BeeStation control panel or Synology website.
- 3. For DiskStation Manager users: Determine your current major version (7.2, 7.2.1, or 7.2.2) and upgrade to the corresponding minimum fixed version: 7.2-64570-4 or later, 7.2.1-69057-6 or later, or 7.2.2-72806-1 or later.
- 4. Download the appropriate update from the Synology Download Center at https://www.synology.com/en-global/support/download, or use the built-in DSM update checker (Control Panel > Update & Restore > DSM Update).
- 5. Apply the update and restart the device as prompted.
- 6. Verify the new version is installed by checking Control Panel > Info Center after the system restarts.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10441 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10441 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data