CVE-2024-10443
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Task Manager component in Synology BeePhotos before 1.0.2-10026 and 1.1.0-10053 and Synology Photos before 1.6.2-0720 and 1.7.0-0795 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS Command Injection vulnerability in the Task Manager component of Synology BeePhotos and Synology Photos allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via unspecified vectors. The critical CVSS 9.8 score indicates the vulnerability is network-exploitable without authentication and can lead to complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.6.2-0720< 1.7.0-0795< 1.1.0-10053< 1.0.2-10026CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Synology photo applicationCheck the installed packages on your Synology NAS for either Synology Photos or Synology BeePhotos using the Package Center or CLI package managerAffected if Neither application is installed on the system
-
Determine installed version of Synology PhotosAccess the Package Center, click on Synology Photos, and note the version number displayed, or query via CLI if availableAffected if Version is below 1.6.2-0720 or below 1.7.0-0795
-
Determine installed version of Synology BeePhotosAccess the Package Center, click on Synology BeePhotos, and note the version number displayed, or query via CLI if availableAffected if Version is below 1.0.2-10026 or below 1.1.0-10053
-
Verify Task Manager accessibilityAttempt to access the Task Manager component within the Photos or BeePhotos web interface to confirm it is enabled and reachableAffected if Task Manager is accessible without authentication or additional access controls
-
Check network exposure of photo servicesReview firewall rules and network settings to determine if the Synology Photos/BeePhotos web interfaces are exposed to untrusted networks or the internetAffected if Service is directly accessible from untrusted networks or the internet without VPN or authentication proxy
You are affected if either Synology Photos version is below 1.6.2-0720 or below 1.7.0-0795, or Synology BeePhotos version is below 1.0.2-10026 or below 1.1.0-10053, and the Task Manager component is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.0.2-100261.1.0-100531.6.2-0720
Upgrade Synology BeePhotos to version 1.0.2-10026 or 1.1.0-10053, and Synology Photos to version 1.6.2-0720 or 1.7.0-0795 or later to patch the command injection vulnerability.
Synology Photos: 1.7.0-0795 or later; Synology BeePhotos: 1.1.0-10053 or later
- 1. Identify which Synology application is in use: Photos or BeePhotos
- 2. For Synology Photos: Upgrade to version 1.7.0-0795 or later
- 3. For Synology BeePhotos: Upgrade to version 1.1.0-10053 or later
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the application version in Package Center
- 5. Restart the Synology device or at minimum restart the Photos/BeePhotos service to ensure the patched code is fully loaded
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10443 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10443 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data