CVE-2024-10469
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVINCE versions before 3.0.9 is vulnerable to exposure of User information to authenticated users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceVINCE before version 3.0.9 contains an access control vulnerability that allows authenticated users to view user information they should not have access to, resulting in unauthorized information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify VINCE installation locationLocate VINCE installation directory, typically found in /opt/vince, /usr/local/vince, or via package manager (rpm -qa | grep vince or dpkg -l | grep vince)Affected if VINCE is not found or not installed (not affected)
-
Determine installed VINCE versionRun command to check version: 'vinceversion' or check VERSION file in installation directory, or query database if accessibleAffected if Version is less than 3.0.9 (vulnerable)
-
Verify authentication is enabledCheck if VINCE user authentication is configured and active by inspecting settings.py or auth configuration files in the VINCE installationAffected if Authentication is enabled and version is < 3.0.9 (affected - the flaw allows authenticated users to bypass access controls)
-
Check user role configurationsReview VINCE user role assignments and access control settings in the admin interface or configuration filesAffected if Multiple user roles exist and version is < 3.0.9 (the vulnerability allows privilege escalation through role-based information disclosure)
If VINCE is installed and the version is below 3.0.9, the environment is affected by this access control bypass vulnerability that permits authenticated users to view unauthorized user information.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.0.9
Upgrade VINCE to version 3.0.9 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
VINCE 3.0.9
- Identify the current VINCE installation version
- Upgrade VINCE to version 3.0.9 or later
- After upgrade, verify that user permissions are correctly configured and no longer exposing sensitive user information to unauthorized authenticated users
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10469 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10469 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data