CVE-2024-10589
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Leopard - WordPress Offload Media plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data that can lead to privilege escalation due to a missing capability check on the import_settings() function in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to update arbitrary options on the WordPress site. This can be leveraged to update the default role for registration to administrator and enable user registration for attackers to gain administrative user access to a vulnerable site.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Leopard WordPress Offload Media plugin has a missing capability check on the import_settings() function, allowing authenticated users with Subscriber-level access to update arbitrary WordPress options. Attackers can enable user registration and set the default registration role to Administrator, achieving privilege escalation to admin access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Leopard Offload Media plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress Admin > Plugins and look for 'Leopard - WordPress Offload Media' in the installed plugins listAffected if The plugin is installed and active in WordPress
-
Check installed plugin versionIn Plugins list, click on the plugin to view its details, or check the version in the plugin's main PHP file (typically at /wp-content/plugins/leopard-offload-media/ directory)Affected if The installed version is lower than 3.1.2 (the fixed version)
-
Check current user registration settingsGo to WordPress Admin > Settings > General and inspect 'Membership' settings, or query the wp_options table for 'users_can_register' and 'default_role' valuesAffected if 'Anyone can register' is enabled and 'Default New User Role' is set to Administrator, but you did not enable these settings
-
Audit administrator-level accountsNavigate to WordPress Admin > Users and review all accounts with Administrator role, or query wp_users and wp_usermeta for administrator capabilitiesAffected if There are unexpected administrator accounts you did not create, or existing subscriber-level users have been elevated to administrator without your action
Your site is affected if the Leopard Offload Media plugin version is below 3.1.2 and you find unauthorized changes to user registration settings or unexpected administrator accounts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Leopard - WordPress Offload Media plugin to version 3.1.2 or later. Verify that no unauthorized administrator accounts have been created and remove any suspicious accounts.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10589 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10589 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data