CVE-2024-10649
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedwandb/openui latest commit c945bb859979659add5f490a874140ad17c56a5d contains a vulnerability where unauthenticated endpoints allow file uploads and downloads from an AWS S3 bucket. This can lead to multiple security issues including denial of service, stored XSS, and information disclosure. The affected endpoints are '/v1/share/{id:str}' for uploading and '/v1/share/{id:str}' for downloading JSON files. The lack of authentication allows any user to upload and overwrite files, potentially causing the S3 bucket to run out of space, injecting malicious scripts, and accessing sensitive information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe wandb/openui application contains unauthenticated API endpoints at '/v1/share/{id:str}' that allow both uploading and downloading JSON files directly from an associated AWS S3 bucket. The lack of authentication on these endpoints permits any user to upload, overwrite, or retrieve files, enabling denial of service through bucket exhaustion, stored XSS via malicious script injection, and information disclosure by accessing arbitrary files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify wandb/openui installationRun 'pip show wandb' or check your package manager for the installed wandb or openui package and note the version numberAffected if The package is installed and version is within the affected range (verify against known vulnerable versions)
-
Confirm endpoint exposureCheck if the application exposes the '/v1/share/{id:str}' API endpoints by reviewing your web server configuration, reverse proxy settings, or API routing definitionsAffected if The '/v1/share' endpoint route is enabled and accessible to network traffic
-
Test endpoint authenticationSend a direct HTTP request to the '/v1/share/testid' endpoint without providing any authentication credentials (e.g., Authorization header, session cookie)Affected if The request returns a successful response (200 OK) instead of requiring authentication (401/403)
-
Verify S3 bucket accessReview the application's configuration for AWS S3 bucket settings associated with the '/v1/share' functionality and check if bucket policies allow public accessAffected if The S3 bucket is configured with weak or missing access controls accessible through the share endpoints
You are affected if wandb/openui is running with the '/v1/share/{id:str}' endpoints exposed and accessible without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement authentication and authorization checks on the '/v1/share/{id:str}' endpoints, validate file types and content before upload, and restrict access to ensure users can only interact with files they own or are explicitly authorized to access.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10649 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10649 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data