CVE-2024-10653
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIDExpert from CHANGING Information Technology does not properly validate a specific parameter in the administrator interface, allowing remote attackers with administrative privileges to inject and execute OS commands on the server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIDExpert from CHANGING Information Technology contains a command injection vulnerability in its administrator interface where a specific parameter lacks proper input validation, allowing authenticated remote attackers with administrative privileges to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands on the underlying server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm IDExpert installationLocate and verify IDExpert application files or running services from CHANGING Information Technology on the systemAffected if IDExpert from CHANGING Information Technology is installed and running
-
Identify admin interface accessibilityDetermine if the administrator web interface is network-accessible (check listening ports, firewall rules, and exposed URLs)Affected if The admin interface is reachable from untrusted networks
-
Verify administrative accounts existCheck for configured administrator accounts in IDExpert (review user configuration files, database, or admin panel user list if accessible)Affected if Administrative user accounts are configured in the system
-
Check IDExpert versionLocate the installed version of IDExpert (check application metadata, about page, or version file) and compare against any known affected version ranges provided by the vendorAffected if The installed version falls within an affected range or cannot be determined
-
Assess authentication exposureEvaluate whether administrative credentials could be obtained by unauthorized actors (review credential policies, account lockout settings, and access logs)Affected if Admin credentials are weak, default, or accessible to untrusted users
The environment is affected if IDExpert is installed, the admin interface is accessible, and administrative accounts exist, allowing authenticated attackers to inject commands through unvalidated parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patch to address input validation in the admin interface; consider restricting admin interface access to trusted networks and implementing web application firewall rules as temporary controls until the patch is deployed.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10653 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10653 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data