CVE-2024-1084
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site Scripting in the tag name pattern field in the tag protections UI in GitHub Enterprise Server allows a malicious website that requires user interaction and social engineering to make changes to a user account via CSP bypass with created CSRF tokens. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.12 and was fixed in all versions of 3.11.5, 3.10.7, 3.9.10, and 3.8.15. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the tag name pattern field within GitHub Enterprise Server's tag protections UI. The attack requires user interaction and social engineering, combined with Content Security Policy (CSP) bypass and crafted CSRF tokens to make unauthorized changes to a user account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.8.15>= 3.9.0, < 3.9.10>= 3.10.0, < 3.10.7>= 3.11.0, < 3.11.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GitHub Enterprise Server versionAccess the GitHub Enterprise Server management console or run 'ghe-version' command via SSH to the instance. Check the Admin Center under 'About' section for the exact version number.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: < 3.8.15, >= 3.9.0 and < 3.9.10, >= 3.10.0 and < 3.10.7, or >= 3.11.0 and < 3.11.5
-
Verify tag protections are accessibleNavigate to a repository's Settings > Tags > Tag protection rules, or check if the account has permissions to manage tag protection patterns.Affected if Tag protection rule management is available and the user has privileges to create or edit tag name patterns
-
Identify the affected componentLocate the 'tag name pattern' input field within the tag protection rules UI for any repository or organization.Affected if The tag name pattern field exists and accepts user input for creating protection rules
You are affected if your GitHub Enterprise Server version is below 3.8.15, between 3.9.0-3.9.9, between 3.10.0-3.10.6, or between 3.11.0-3.11.4, and you have users with access to tag protection rule management.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.8.153.9.103.10.7
Upgrade GitHub Enterprise Server to version 3.11.5, 3.10.7, 3.9.10, 3.8.15 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
Upgrade to version 3.8.15, 3.9.10, 3.10.7, or 3.11.5 depending on your current version branch
- 1. Identify the current GitHub Enterprise Server version by navigating to the admin console or running: ghe-version
- 2. Determine the appropriate target version based on current version: if < 3.8.15 upgrade to 3.8.15; if >= 3.9.0 and < 3.9.10 upgrade to 3.9.10; if >= 3.10.0 and < 3.10.7 upgrade to 3.10.7; if >= 3.11.0 and < 3.11.5 upgrade to 3.11.5
- 3. Review the GitHub Enterprise Server release notes for the target version to check for any breaking changes or required migration steps
- 4. Take a backup of the GitHub Enterprise Server instance following standard backup procedures
- 5. Upgrade to the target version using the standard GitHub Enterprise Server upgrade process (e.g., using the upgrade package or admin console)
- 6. After upgrade, verify the version has been updated successfully and the tag protections UI is functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1084 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1084 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data